GEJMIFIKACIJA PROCESA RESTORATIVNE PRAVDE: KONCEPTUALNI OKVIR I MOGUĆNOSTI PRIMENE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51738/kpolisa.2026.1r.afmkKljučne reči:
restorativna pravda, gejmifikacija, perspektivno razumevanje, empatija, interaktivne simulacije, refleksija, dijalogApstrakt
Rad razmatra mogućnosti i ograničenja primene gejmifikacije u okviru procesa restorativne pravde, polazeći od pretpostavke da savremeni interaktivni modeli mogu doprineti unapređenju razumevanja konflikta, razvoja empatije i refleksije učesnika. Restorativna pravda se zasniva na dijalogu između prestupnika, žrtve i zajednice, sa ciljem preuzimanja odgovornosti, razumevanja štete i obnove narušenih odnosa. Međutim, njena praktična primena često je otežana nedovoljnom spremnošću učesnika za perspektivno razumevanje, emocionalnim barijerama i nedostatkom adekvatnih metodoloških alata za pripremu i omogućavanje procesa. U tom kontekstu, rad ispituje potencijal gejmifikacije kao pristupa koji koristi mehanike igara, poput igranja uloga, interaktivnih narativa i simulacije odluka, kako bi podstakao iskustveno učenje i angažman. Kroz teorijsku analizu, identifikuju se ključne faze restorativnog procesa, razumevanje štete, preuzimanje perspektive druge strane, dijalog, reparacija i refleksija, i razmatraju načini na koje bi gejmifikacioni modeli mogli podržati svaku od njih. Posebna pažnja posvećena je ulozi simulacija u razvoju empatije i pripremi za restorativni susret, kao i potencijalu refleksivnih mehanizama za dublje razumevanje posledica konflikta. Istovremeno, rad ukazuje na značajna etička i metodološka ograničenja, uključujući rizik trivijalizacije konflikta, psihološke osetljivosti učesnika i institucionalne prepreke primeni ovakvih pristupa. Zaključno, gejmifikacija se ne može posmatrati kao zamena za restorativni dijalog, već kao dopunski alat koji može unaprediti pojedine faze procesa. Njena vrednost leži u proširenju prostora za refleksiju, perspektivno razumevanje i pripremu učesnika, čime doprinosi razvoju savremenih metodoloških pristupa u restorativnoj pravdi.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Arendt, H. (2000). Eichmann in Jerusalem. Viking Press.
Aristotel. (1988) Nikomahova etika. [Nicomachean Ethics]. Globus.
Augustine. (1988). The City of God Against the Pagans [De civitate Dei contra paganos]. Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Ha l.
Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in Humans. oxford University Press.
Bjelajac, Ž., & Bajac, M. (2022). Blockchain Technology and Money Laundering. Pravo – Teorija i Praksa, 39(2), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2202021B.
Bjelajac, Ž., & Filipović, A. M. (2020). Internet addiction disorder (IAD) as a paradigm of lack of security culture. Kultura polisa, 17(43), 239–258.
Bjelajac, Ž., Filipović, A. M., & Stošić, L. V. (2022). Internet Addiction Disorder (IAD) as a Consequence of the Expansion of Information Technologies. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 10(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.23947/23348496-2022-10-3-155-165
Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. MIT Press.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. oxford University Press
Byom, L. J., & Mutlu, B. (2013). Theory of mind: mechanisms, methods, and new directions. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 413. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00413
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R. & Nacke, L. (2011). From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining Gamification. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, MindTrek 2011. 11. 9, 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi.
Duff, R. A. (2001). Punishment, Communication, and Community. oxford University Press.
Durkheim, E. (1984). The Division of Labor in Society. Free Press.
Facchino, A., Marchetti, D., Colasanti, M., Fontanesi, L., & Verrocchio, M. (2025) The use of serious games for psychological education and training: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1511729
Tseng, C. I., & Thiele, L. (2024). Actions and digital empathy in the interactive storyte ling of serious games: a multimodal discourse approach. Social Semiotics, 34(3), 412–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2128039
Ferreira, P. C., Simão, A. M. V., Paiva, A., Martinho, C., Prada, R., Ferreira, A., & Santos, F. (2021). Exploring empathy in cyberbu lying with serious games. Computers & Education, 166, 104155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104155
Floridi, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. oxford: oxford University Press.
Fulham, L., Blais, J., Rugge, T., & Schultheis, E. A. (2025). The effectiveness of restorative justice programs: A meta, analysis of recidivism and other relevant outcomes. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 25(5), 1486, 1512.
Garland, D. (2001). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. University of Chicago Press.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Prentice Ha l.
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second, Level Digital Divide: Di ferences in People's online Ski ls. First Monday, 7(4).
Healey, M. L., & Grossman, M. (2018). Cognitive and A fective Perspective, Taking: Evidence for Shared and Dissociable Anatomical Substrates. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 491.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1821/1991). Elements of the Philosophy of Right, Cambridge University Press.
Heidegger, M. (1977). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and Recovery. New York: Basic Books.
Hobbes, T. (1668). Leviathan, sive, De materia, forma, & potestate civitatis ecclesiasticae et civilis. Joan Blaeu.
Jaspers, K. (2000). The Question of German Guilt. Fordham University Press.
Jin, Y., Ma, M., Hua, D., Coward, S. (2017). Games for Mental and Moral Development of Youth: A Review of Empirical Studies. In: Alcañiz, M., Göbel, S., Ma, M., Fradinho oliveira, M., Baalsrud Hauge, J., Marsh, T. (eds) Serious Games. JCSG 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10622. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70111-0_23
Johnstone, G. (2011). Restorative Justice: Ideas, Values, Debates. London: Routledge.
Kant, I. (2018). Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Kim, T. W. (2015). Gamification Ethics: Exploitation and Manipulation. Figshare, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1184/r1/6705644
Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practices: A Meta, Analysis. The Prison Journal, 85(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505276969
Marshal, T. (1999). Restorative Justice: An Overview. Home office.
Maruna, S. (2001). Making Good: How Ex, Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. American Psychological Association.
Mika, H., Achi les, M., Halbert, E., Stutzman Amstutz, L., & Zehr, H. (2004). Listening to Victims—A Critique of Restorative Justice Policy and Practice in Canada. Federal Probation, 68(1), 32, 38.
Niebuhr, R. (1943). The Nature and Destiny of Man. Nisbet & Co. Ltd.
Olivier, L., Sterkenburg, P., & van Rensburg, E. (2019). The effect of a serious game on empathy and prejudice of psychology students towards persons with disabilities. African journal of disability, 8, 328. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.328
Platon. (2025). Zakoni. Kontrast Izdavaštvo.
Restorative Justice Council. (2016). RJC Practitioners’ Handbook; Manual for Restorative Meetings in Cases of Serious Crime; Restorative Justice Council. https://restorativejustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/files/Practitioners%20Handbook_0.pdf
Ricoeur, P. (1986). The Symbolism of Evil. Beacon Press.
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press.
Samuel, S., Cole, G. G., & Eacott, M. J. (2023). It’s Not You, It’s Me: A Review of Individual Differences in Visuospatial Perspective Taking. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(2), 293, 308. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221094545
Sherman, L. W., & Strang, H. (2007). Restorative Justice: The Evidence. The Smith Institute.
Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., Bennett, S., Angel, C., NewburyBirch, D., Woods, D., & Gi l, C. (2007). Restorative justice: the evidence. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). http://hdl.handle.net/1885/25704.
Sicart, M. (2009). The Ethics of Computer Games. MIT Press.
Staub, E. (2006). Reconciliation after Genocide, Mass Ki ling, or Intractable Conflict: Understanding the Roots of Violence, Psychological Recovery, and Steps toward a General Theory. Political Psychology, 27(6), 867–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679221.2006.00541.x
Tong, X., Gromala, D., Ziabari, S. P. K., & Shaw, C. D. (2020). Designing a virtual reality game for promoting empathy toward patients with chronic pain: Feasibility and Usability study. JMIR Serious Games, 8(3), e17354. https://doi.org/10.2196/17354
Umbreit, M. S., Vos, B., & Coates, R. (2006). Restorative Justice Dialogue: An Essential Guide for Research and Practice. Springer.
Van Der Lubbe, L., Gerritsen, C., Klein, M., & Hindriks, K. (2021). Empowering vulnerable target groups with serious games and gamification. Entertainment Computing, 38, 100402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2020.100402
van Dijk, J. (2020). The Digital Divide. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wratha l, M. N. (2025). “Martin Heidegger,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Zehr, H. (2002). The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Good Books.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
##category.category##
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2026 Aleksandar Filipović, Marina Kovačević
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
