PRIMENA TEORIJE ATRIBUCIJE U PSIHOLOGIJI RELIGIJE
Ključne reči:
религија, психологија, атрибуција, „интринзично“, „екстринзично“Apstrakt
Теорија атрибуције је једна од „врућих“ теорија у области психологије религије. Фокусирајући се на когнитивне механизме путем којих индивидуе перципирају и интерпретирају узроке догађа(н)ја и сопствених и туђих искустава, представља богато полазиште за анализирање начина и услова под којима се догађаји и искуства у одређеним случајевима атрибуирају ентитетима религијске природе. Примена теорије атрибуције у области психологије религије се десила прилично касно, '80-их година 20. века, услед чега ова област проучавања (и даље) „пати“ од бројних проблема теоријске и методолошке природе. Поред приказа досадашњих резултата на овом пољу проучавања, у раду ће се посебна пажња посветити елаборацији основних појмова и концепата који чине окосницу проучавања атрибуционог процеса у области психологије религије, као и могућности употребе алтернативних теоријских оквира за проучавање религијске мотивације, веровања, понашања и делања.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Allport, G. W. (1950). The individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation. New York: Macmillan.
Allport, G. W. (1966). „The religious context of prejudice“. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 5: 447-457.
Batson, C. D. (1976). Religion as prosocial: Agent or double agent? Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 15 (1): 29-45.
Batson, C. D. (1977). Experimentation in Psychology of Religion: An Impossible Dream. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 16 (4): 413-418.
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In: L. Berkowitz (Ed). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol 6: 1-62. New York: Academic Press.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment. Attachment and Loss. Vol I. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Clinical Applications of Attachment Theory. London: Routledge
Bulman, R. J. and C. B. Wortman (1977). „Attribution of blame and coping in the real world: Severe accident victims react to their lot”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35: 351-363.
Campbell, D. T. (1969). „Reforms as experiments”. American Psychologist 24: 409-429.
Campbell, D. T. (1975). „On the conflict between biologican and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition”. American Psychologist 30: 1103- 1126.
Crittenden, K. (1983). Sociological Aspects of attribution. Annual Review of Sociology 9: 425-446.
Ćimić, E. (2001). Čemu predmet “Kultura religija”? Revija slobodne misli. Sarajevo.
Diener, C. T.and C. S. Dweck. (1978). „An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 451-462.
Dittes, J. E. (1971). Typing the typologies: Some parallels in the career of churchsect and extrinsic-intrinsic. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 10 (4): 375-383.
Donahue, M. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: The empirical research. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 24 (4): 418-423.
Feagin, J. R. (1964). Prejudice and religious types: A focused study of Southern fundamentalists. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 4 (1): 3-13.
Forsterling, F. (2001). Attribution: An Introduction to Theories, Research, and Applications. UK: Psychology Press Ltd.
Fox, C.A., Blanton, P. W. and M. L. Morris (1998). Religious Problem-Solving Styles: Three Styles Revisited. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 37 (4): 673-677.
Frojd, S. (1970). Psihopatologija svakodnevnog života Novi Sad: Matica srpska.
Gorsuch, R. L. and C. S. Smith (1983). Attribution of Responsibility to God: An Interaction of Religious Belief and Outcomes. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 22 (4): 340-352.
Gorsuch, R. L. and S. E. McPherson (1989). Intrinsic/Extrinsic measurement: I/ERevised and single-item scales. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 28 (3): 348-354.
Hoge, D. R. (1972). A validated Intrinsic Religious Motivation Scale. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 11 (4): 369-372.
Hood, R. W. Jr. (1978). The usefulness of the indiscriminately pro and anti categories of religious orientation. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 17 (4): 419-431.
Horton, R. (1960). A Definition of Religion, and its Use. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 90(2): 201-226.
Hunt, R. and M. King (1971). The intrinsic-extrinsic concept: A review and evaluation. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 10 (4): 339-356.
Jones, E. E. (1976). How do people perceive the causes of behavior? American Scientist 64:300-305.
Jung, K. G. (1978). Psihologija i religija. U- Psihološke rasprave. Novi Sad: Matica srpska.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28: 107-128.
Kirkpatrick, L. A. and R. W. Hood (1990). Intrinsic-Extrinsic Religious Orientation: The Boon or Bane of Contemporary Psychology of Religion? Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 29 (4): 442-462.
Lupfer, M. B., Brock, K. F. and S. J. DePaola (1992). The Use of Secular and Religious Attributions to Explain Everyday Behavior. Journal of Scientific Study of Religion 31 (4): 486-503.
Lupfer, M. B., Tolliver, D. and M. Jackson (1996). Explaining Life-Altering Occurrences: A Test of the “God-of-the-Gaps” Hypothesis. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 35 (4): 379-391.
McFarland, S. G. (1989). Religious orientations and targets of discrimination. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 28(3): 324-336.
Miner, M. H. and McKnight (1999). Religious Attributions: Situational Factors and Effects on Coping. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 38 (2): 274-286.
Newman, J. S. and K. I. Pargament (1990). The Role of Religion in the ProblemSolving Process. Review of Religious Research 31 (4): 390-404.
Pargament, K. I. and J. Hahn (1986). God and the Just World: Causal and Coping Attribution to God in Health Situations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 25 (2): 193-207.
Proudfoot, W. and P. Shaver (1975). Attribution Theory and the Psychology of Religion. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 14 (4): 317-330.
Rotter, J.B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: PrenticeHall.
Rotter, J.B. (1990). Inernal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. American Psychologist 45 (4): 489-493.
Seybold, K. S. and P. C. Hill (2001). The Role of Religion and Spirituality in Mental and Physical Health. Current Directions in Psychological Science 10 (1): 21-24.
Spilka, B. and G. Schmidt (1983). General Attribution Theory for the Psychology of Religion: The Influence of Event-Character on Attributions to God. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 22 (4): 326-339.
Spilka, B., Shaver, P. and L. A. Kirkpatrick (1985). A General Attribution Theory for the Psychology of Religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 24 (1):1-20.
Sremac, S. (2008). Theoretical approaches to coping with crises and conversion. Religija i tolerancija 6 (10): 55-71.
Šušnjić, Đ. (1995). Znati i verovati: Teorijske orijentacije u proučavanju religije i ateizma. Beograd: Čigoja štampa.
Taylor, S. E. (1983). „Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptacion”. American Psychologist 38: 1161-1173.
Weiner, B. (1972). Theories of Motivation: From Mechanism to Cognition. Chicago: Markham.
White, R. W. (1959). „Motivation Reconsidered: The concept of competence”. Psychological Review 66: 297-333.
