FEMINISTIČKA ANALIZA KOMODIFIKACIJE REPRODUKTIVNOG RADA ŽENA
Ključne reči:
комодификација, репродуктивни рад, сурогат мајчинство, теза о идентитету, теза о аутономијиApstrakt
У раду се даје преглед основних феминистичких схватања на тему комодификације репродуктивног рада жена који подразумева продају ооцита и изнајмљивање репродуктивних капацитета жена у виду комерцијалног сурогат мајчинства. Посебна пажња посвећена је критичкој анализи феминистичких аргумената „у корист новца” и „у корист достојанства” на тему комодификације репродуктивног рада жена, као и значењу појмова комодификације и отуђивости и специфичној употреби ових појмова у феминистичкој литератури на тему репродуктивног рада жена.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Alpers, A. and Lo, B. (1995). ‘Commodification and Commercialization in Human Embryo Research’. Stanford Law and Policy Review 6/2: 39–46.
Anderson, E. S. (1990). Is Women’s Labor a Commodity? Philosophy & Public Affairs 19 (1): 71-92.
Arneson, R. J. (1992). Commodification and Commercial Surrogacy. Philosophy & Public Affairs 21 (2): 132-164.
Bray, F. (2007). Gender and Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology 36: 37-53.
Briggs, L. (2010). Reproductive Technology: Of Labor and Markets Author. Feminist Studies 36 (2): 359-374.
Carsten, J. (2004). After Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corea, G. (1992). The Mother Machine. In: K. D. Alpern (ed.)(1992). The Ethics of Reproductive Technology (pp. 220-231). New York: Oxford University Press.
Corea, G. (2005). The Subversive Sperm: ’A False strain of Blood.’In: R. T. Hull (ed.)(2005). Ethical Issues in the New Reproductive Technologies, Second edition (pp. 63-76). New York: Prometheus Books.
Curtis, K. F. (1995). Hannah Arendt, Feminist Theorizing, and the Debate over New Reproductive Technologies. Polity 28 (2): 159-187.
Davies, D. S. (2010). Genetic Dilemmas: Reproductive Technology, Parentan Choices and Children’s Futures. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dickenson, D. L. (1997). Procuring Gametes for Research and Therapy: The Argument for Unisex Altruism: A Response to Donald Evans. Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (2): 93-95.
Dickenson, D. L. (2001). Property and Women’s Alienation from their Own Reproductive Labour. Bioethics 15 (3): 205-217.
Donchin, A. (2009). Toward a Gender-Sensitive Assisted Reproduction Policy. Bioethics 23 (1): 28-38.
Edwards, J. N. (1991). New Conceptions: Biosocial Innovations and the Family. Journal of Marriage and Family 53 (2): 349-360.
Fox, R. C. (1993). Reproduction and Succession: Studies in Anthropology, Law, and Society. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Franklin, S. and H. Ragone (1998). Introduction. In: S. Franklin and H. Ragone (eds.)(1998). Reproducing reproduction: Kinship, power, and technological innovation (pp. 1-14). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Ginsburg, F. D. and R. Rapp (1995). Introduction: Conceiving the New World Order. In: F. D. Ginsburg and R. Rapp (eds.)(1995). Conceiving the New World Order: The global politics of reproduction (pp. 1-17). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Handwerker, L. (2003). New Genetic Technologies and Their Impact on Women: A Feminist Perspective. Gender and Society 11 (1): 114-124.
Harrington, J., G. Becker and R. Nachtigall (2008). Nonreproductive Technologies: Remediating Kin Structure with Donor Gametes. Science, Technology & Human Values 33 (3): 393-418.
Hartouni, V. (1997). Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life. London: University of Minnesota Press.
Inhorn, M. C. (2002). The ’Local’ Confronts the ’Global’: Infertile Bodies and New Reproductive Technology in Egypt. In: M. C. Inhorn and F. van Balen (eds.)(2002). Infertility around the Globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies (pp. 263-282). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Inhorn, M. C. and D. Birenbaum-Carmeli (2008). Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Cultural Change. Annual Review of Anthropology 37: 177-196.
Kass, L. R. and B. Glass (1971). What Price the Perfect Baby? Science, New Series 173 (3992): 103-104.
Keane, N. P. (1992). Legal Problems of Surrogate Motherhood. In: K. D. Alpern (ed.)(1992). The Ethics of Reproductive Technology (pp. 269-276). New York: Oxford University Press.
Krimmel, H. T. (1983). The Case against Surrogate Parenting. The Hastings Center Report 13 (5): 35-39.
Krimmel, H. T. (1992). Surrogate Mother Arrangements from the Perspective of the Child. In: K. D. Alpern (ed.)(1992). The Ethics of Reproductive Technology (pp. 57-70). New York: Oxford University Press.
Levine, H. B. (2003). Gestational Surrogacy: Nature and Culture in Kinship. Ethnology 42 (3): 173-185.
Liesen, L. T. (1995). Feminism and the Politics of Reproductive Strategies. Politics and the Life Sciences 14 (2): 145-162.
Lowry, D. W. (2004). Understanding Reproductive Technologies as a Surveillant Assemblage: Revisions of Power and Technoscience. Sociological Perspectives 47 (4): 357-370.
Marks, K. (1867/1947). Kapital – Tom I. Zagreb: Kultura.
McLeod, C. (2007). For Dignity or Money: Feminists on the Commodification of Women’s Reproductive Labour. In: B. Steinbock (ed.)(2007). The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics (pp. 258-284). New York: Oxford University Press.
Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. California: Stanford University Press.
Radin, M. (1991). ‘Reflections on Objectification’. Southern California Law Review 65:341–54.
Radin, M. J. (1987). Market-Inalienability. Harvard Law Review 100 (8): 1849-1937.
Radin, M. J. (1988). Rent Control and Incomplete Commodification: A Rejoinder. Philosophy & Public Affairs 17 (1): 80-83.
Radin, M. J. (1993). Reinterpreting Property. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Ragoné, H. (1996). Chasing the Blood Tie: Surrogate Mothers, Adoptive Mothers and Fathers. American Ethnologist 23 (2): 352-365.
Robertson, J A. (1983a). Surrogate Motherhood: Not So Novel After All. The Hastings Center Report 13 (5): 28-34.
Robertson, J. A. (1983b). Procreative Liberty and the Control of Conception, Pregnancy, and Childbirth. Virginia Law Review 69 (3): 405-464.
Robertson, J. A. (1992). Noncoital Reproduction and Procreative Liberty. In: K. D. Alpern (ed.)(1992). The Ethics of Reproductive Technology (pp. 249-258). New York: Oxford University Press.
Robertson, J. A. (1994). Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Robertson, J. A. (1995). Reproduction and Rights: A Response to Dorothy Roberts: [Commentary]. Law & Social Inquiry 20 (4): 1023-1032.
Rowland, R. (1987). Technology and Motherhood: Reproductive Choice Reconsidered. Signs 12 (3): 512-528.
Ryan, M. A. (1990). The Argument for Unlimited Procreative Liberty: A Feminist Critique. The Hastings Center Report 20 (4): 6-12.
Sandelowski, M. (1991). Compelled to Try: The Never-Enough Quality of Conceptive Technology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, New Series 5 (1): 29-47.
Sandelowski, M. and S. de Lacey (2002). The Uses of a ’Disease’: Infertility as Rhetorical Vehicle. In: M. C. Inhorn and F. van Balen (eds.)(2002). Infertility around the Globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies (pp. 33- 51). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Satz, D. (1992). Markets in Women’s Reproductive Labor. Philosophy & Public Affairs 21 (2): 107-131.
Scott, E. S. (2009). Surrogacy and the Politics of Commodification. Law and Contemporary Problems 72 (3): 109-146.
Shanley, M. L. (1993). Surrogate Mothering and Women’s Freedom: A Critique of Contracts for Human Reproduction. Singns 18 (3): 618-639.
Shore, C., R. G. Abrahams, J. F. Collier, C. Delaney, R. Fox, R. Frankenberg, H. S. Lambert, M. Melhuus, D. M. Schneider, V. Stolcke and S. Wolfram (1992). Virgin Births and Sterile Debates: Anthropology and the New Reproductive Technologies. Current Anthropology 33 (3): 295-314.
Shultz, M. M. (1990). ‘Reproductive Technology and Intent-Based Parenthood: An Opportunity for Gender Neutrality’. Wisconsin Law Review 297: 287–398.
Steinbock, B. (1994). Reproductive Rights and Responsibilities. The Hastings Center Report 24 (3):15-16.
Strathern, M. (1992). Reproducing the Future: Essays on anthropology, kinship and the new reproductive technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Strathern, M. (1995). Discplacing Knowledge: Teshnology and the Consequences for Kinship. In: F. D. Ginsburg and R. Rapp (eds.)(1995). Conceiving the New World Order: The global politics of reproduction (pp. 346-364). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Thompson, C. M. (2002). Fertile Ground: Feminists Theorize Infertility. In: M. C. Inhorn and F. van Balen (eds.)(2002). Infertility around the Globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies (pp. 52-78). Berkeley: University of California Press.
van Balen, F. and M. C. Inhorn (2002). Interpreting infertility: A View from the Social Sciences. In: M. C. Inhorn and F. van Balen (eds.)(2002). Infertility around the Globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies (pp. 3-32). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Walter, L. (1995). Feminist Anthropology? Gender and Society 9 (3): 272-288.
Wertheimer, A. (1992). Two Questions About Surrogacy and Exploitation. Philosophy & Public Affairs 21 (3): 211-239.
Wilkinson, S. (2010). Choosing Tomorrow’s Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction. New York: Clarendon Press.
