POLITIČKO-EKONOMSKI MOTIVI FTA PREGOVORA JUŽNE KOREJE I JAPANA

Autori

  • Lidija Elliott St. Mary College Nagoya, Japan

Ključne reči:

економија, FTA споразум, предности, преговори, политичко окружење, пословна стратегија, влада

Apstrakt

FTA питање има велики стратешки значај и за Јапан и за Јужну Кореју у овом периоду радикалних промена у међународном окружењу. Ја говорим о реформи глобалној надмоћи, успону Кине, паду Сједињених Држава и других промена, посебно у азијско-пацифичком региону. FTA између Јапана и Јужне Кореје су од стратешког значаја јер могу допринети не само економији ове две земље, него и мир и стабилност у азијско-пацифичком региону и свету.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Reference

Aggarwal,V.K. and Koo, M.G, (2005)”Beyond Network Power? The Dynamics of Formal Economic Integration in Northeast Asia” The Pacific Review, Vol. 18 (2) pp. 189–216 Chulki. J. (2003) „The Competitive Liberalization of World Trade and Korea’s Foreign Trade policy”, Global Economic Review, Vol. 32 (2), pp. 1-19

Dent, C.M. (2008), „East Asian Regionalism, Routledge”, London

Dent, C.M. (2002), "South Korea: the FEP of a Deconstructing Developmental State". In The Foreign Economic Policies of Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Glos, pp.132-207

Cheong, I. and Cho, J. (2009) „Domestic and Foreign JKFTA Conditions and Negotiation outlook”, The Asia-Pacific Research, Vol. 16 (1), pp.159-178

Corbett, J. (2008), ‘Services Trade Liberalisation in the ASEAN Economic Community

and Beyond’, in Soesastro, H. (ed.), Deepening Economic Integration- The ASEAN

Economic Community and Beyond-, ERIA Research Project Report 2007-1-2, Chiba:

IDE-JETRO, pp.101-120.

Available at: http://www.unescap.org/tid/projects/tradeservice_s2.pdf

Fukagawa. Y. (1999) „Asian Nies in the Region’s Economic Recovery and the Options for South Korea: The Potentials for Japan-Korea FTA”, The Pacific Review, Vol. 28 (4), pp. 79-101

Fink, C and M Molinuevo (2007). „East Asia in Free Trade Agreements in Services: Roaring Tigers or Timid Pandas?”in Trade Issues in East Asia: Liberalization of Trade in Services , Washington, D.C.: East Asia and Pacific Region Poverty Reduction and Economic Management, World Bank.

Hout. T.M. and Ghemawat. P. (2010) „China Vs the World: Whose Technology is It” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 88 (12), pp 94-103

Ju, C. (2003) „The Competitive Liberalization of World Trade and Korea’s Foreign Trade Policy” Global Economic Review, Vol.32 (2), pp. 1-18

Park. S and Park. I. (2009) „Free Trade Agreements versus Customs Union: An Examination of East Asia” Asian Economic Papers”, Vol. 8(2), pp.119-139

Sekiguchi,S. 1993.”Korean Peninsula Issues and U.S.-Japan-South Korea Relations”, ed. By Gong. G, Sato, Ok.Tae. The Center for Strategic and International Studies Washington, D.C. Vol. 2, pp.71-115

Rhee, H.Y. (1998)”The Economic Crisis of South Korea and Its Political Impact”, International Journal of Korean Studies, Vol. 2(1), pp. 129-146

Urata, S.E. (2007), "Japan’s FTA Strategy and Free Trade Area of Asia-Pacific ". In Morrison, C.E. and Pedrosa, E. (eds), An APEC Trade Agenda? The Political Economy of A Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific, ISEAS, Singapore, pp. 99- 127

Wendt. A. (1992) „Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics „, International Organization, Vol.46 (2), pp. 391-425.

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

2014-06-30

Broj časopisa

Sekcija

Прегледни рад

##plugins.generic.badges.manager.settings.showBlockTitle##