Načelo istine i slobodne ocene dokaza u upravnom postupku – između normativne formulacije i stvarne primene
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51738/kpolisa.2026.2r.nzdbApstrakt
Upravni postupak predstavlja osnovni instrument za ostvarivanje i zaštitu prava i obaveza stranaka u
odnosu prema organima javne vlasti, dok pravilno utvrđivanje činjenica neposredno utiče na zakonitost i
pravičnost odlučivanja. Rad analizira načelo istine i slobodne ocene dokaza, sa posebnim osvrtom na
odnos između normativnog zahteva za potpunim utvrđivanjem činjenica i ograničenja koja se javljaju u
praksi. Posebna pažnja posvećena je ulozi organa uprave u pribavljanju i oceni dokaza, pravima stranaka,
srazmernosti i sudskoj kontroli. Cilj rada je da ukaže na ključne probleme u primeni ovih načela i
mogućnosti unapređenja upravne prakse.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Reference
Hasanbegović, J. (1996). On the Legal Syllogism. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade, 44(2–3), 165–172.
Kelsen, H. (2010). General Theory of Law and State. Faculty of Law, University of Belgrade.
Knežević, M. S. (2016). The Adversarial Principle in Serbian Civil Procedure. Official Gazette.
Lilić, S. (2017). Commentary and critical analysis of the Law on General Administrative Procedure. Official Gazette.
Lilić, S. (2023). Administrative law – administrative procedural law. Faculty of Law University of Belgrade.
Ljubanović, B. (2019). The principle of material truth and administrative procedure. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 19(4), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.19.4.6
Marković, R. (2002). Administrative law: General part (2nd rev. and expanded ed.).
Martinović, A. (2004). The concept of administration in Serbian legal scholarship. IP Justinijan.
Mayer, O. (1895). Deutsches Verwaltungsrecht [German administrative law]. Duncker & Humblot.
Milkov, D. (2017). Administrative law II: Administrative activity (9th rev. and expanded ed.). Faculty of Law University of Novi Sad, Publishing Center.
Milkov, D., & Radošević, R. (2024). Collection of procedural material and burden of proof in administrative proceedings. Proceedings of the Faculty of Law in Novi Sad, 58(3), 517–539. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns58-54023
Radošević, R. (2015). Administrative dispute due to administrative silence]. Proceedings of the Faculty of Law in Novi Sad, 49(4), 1971–1986. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns49-9458
Rajko, A. (2013). Establishing facts and evidentiary proceedings in administrative disputes. Proceedings of the Faculty of Law, University of Rijeka, 34(1), 495–524.
Legislation
National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia. (2023). Law on General Administrative Procedure. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, Nos. 18/2016, 95/2018 – authentic interpretation, and 2/2023 – Constitutional Court decision.
Case Law
Administrative Court of the Republic of Serbia. (2019, December 24). Judgment 9-U-16494/2019.
Administrative Court of the Republic of Serbia. (2021, February 11). Judgment Už-16744/2019.
Administrative Court of the Republic of Serbia. (2022, September 15). Judgment Už-13012/2020.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Serbia. (2017, July 13). Decision Už-8814/2016.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Serbia. (2017, October 26). Decision Už-3109/2016.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Serbia. (2022, October 13). Decision Už-7840/2019.
Suominen v. Finland, App. No. 37801/97, European Court of Human Rights (2003, July 1).
Supreme Court of Cassation of the Republic of Serbia. (2020, June 1). Decision Rž1up. 27/2020.
Supreme Court of Cassation of the Republic of Serbia. (2021, May 26). Judgment Uzp. 94/2021.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Serbia. (2024, May 14). Judgment Uzp. 193/2023.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2026 Nada Živanović, Dejan Bukazić
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
