PARADIGMS REFRACTION – KUHN’S, POPPER’S, HUSSERL’S AND GADAMER’S PERSPECTIVES
Keywords:
paradigm, normal science, scientific revolution, true science, pseudoscience, phenomenology, holy life, hermeneuticsAbstract
This study discusses the basic characteristics of the paradigms, of Kuhn, Popper, Husserl, and Gadamer, in science and scientific methodology. The authors have tried, not only to demonstrate the central references of the mentioned paradigms, but also to analyze the conditions as methodological and epistemological points of their refraction, and the convergence of opposites. Each of these theoretical, cognitive and methodological perspectives is searching for reliable means for discovering the truth and an answer to the question: what can actually be known, in fact, what are the limits of human knowledge? A diversity of approaches and the starting points, in efforts to formulate scientific truth, does not treat the weaknesses of science. A proper use of a number of paradigms can contribute to the development of cognitive abilities of science. For this reason it is advisable to find their complementary aspects.
Downloads
References
Brdar, Milan (2015). Hajdeger i Hegel: fenomenološka metoda kao topos konfrotacije (Studiae Heideggerianae). Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke, 152, 363-392.
Carić, O., Carić, M.(2011). Metodologija naučnih istraživanja. Pedagoška stvarnost, 26-32.
Carić, O., Smieško Bokanić, O.(2015.). Science and Scientific Method as Part of Urban Culture Taught on Serbian Universities, Kultura polisa, 489-497.
Carić,M., Carić,O., Smieško O.(2013). Construction and Techniques of Writing a Scientific Paper in Natural and Engineering Sciences. Jour. Nat. Sci., 119-128.
Diltaj, V. (1980). Izgradnja istorijskog sveta u duhovnim naukama. Beograd: BIGZ.
Gadamer, H. G. (1978). Istina i metoda. Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša.
Gadamer, H. G. (2005). Fenomenološki pokret. Beograd: Plato.
Đinđić, Z., Melčić, D. (1991). Istorija, kriza nauka i 'svet života' u filozofiji kasnog Huserla, U: Edmund Huserl, Kriza evropskih nauka i transcedentalna fenomenologija, preveo Zoran Đinđić. Gornji Milanovac: Dečije novine, str. 395-438.
Huserl, E. (1991). Kriza evropskih nauka i transcendentalna fenomenologija. Gornji Milanovac: Dečije novine.
Huserl, Edmund (1975). Ideja fenomenologije: pet predavanja. Beograd. BIGZ.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kun, T. S. (1974). Struktura naučnih revolucija. Beograd: Nolit.
Milić, V. (1965). Sociološki metod. Beograd: Nolit.
Nikolić, Z. (2002). Sociologija. Sarajevo: Pravni fakultet.
Nikolić, Z. (2010). Metodologija naučno-istraživačkog rada. Novi Sad: Fakultet za ekonomiju i inženjerski menadžment.
Nikolić, Z. (2011-a). Savremena sociologija. Novi Sad: Fakultet za ekonomiju i inženjerski menadžment.
Nikolić, Z. (2011-b) Neke osobenosti metodologije, metoda i istraživanja pojava prava. Srpska politička misao, 1, 347-365.
Nikolić, Z. (2014) Transhumanizam, bioetkia i kiborgkratija. Zbornik radova: Savremene paradigme u nauci i naučnoj fantastici. Naučni skup: Nauka i savremeni univerzitet 3, Niš: Filozofski fakultet – Univerzitet u Nišu, 320-333.
Poper, K. (1973). Logika naučnog otkrića. Beograd: Nolit.
Poper, K. (2002). Pretpostavke i pobijanja – rast naučnog znanja. Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
Poper, K. (2009). Beda istoricizma. Beograd: Dereta.
Ratković, R. (1979). Osnovi marksističke teorije društva. Beograd: Institut za političke studije.
Spasić, I. (2004). Sociologija svakodnevnog života. Beograd: ZUNS.
