THEORETICAL VIEW ON HISTORY

Authors

  • Miloš Savin Центар за демократију и развој Нови Сад
  • Nemanja Starović Центар за демократију и развој Нови Сад

Keywords:

history, theory, socio-theoretical concept

Abstract

The paper analyzes the socio-theoretical perspectives on historical science and its’ place in the corpus of social sciences and humanities. Although it is often thought that only Marxists’ view towards history has given greater theoretical basis and widely introduced social history into the ‘classical history’, some modern scholars, especially the AngloAmerican historiographers and philosophers of history provide somewhat different views. On the other hand, however, there are strong voices and arguments stating that the excessive abstraction of historical science leads inevitably to the impossibility of fitting the historical facts (understood in the broadest sense) in the theory. In addition to this belief, there is widespread credence that even a subject of historical science could twist into the pure theory. There are also still those historians of all periods who remain just mere compilers and reproducers of facts found in the sources and older literature. Authors of the paper, therefore, attempt to demonstrate that the socio-theoretical views and theories themselves and its ‘symbiosis with the basis of historical science is possible, without history losing its specificity as a science and its’ distinctiveness in relation to other theoretical and social sciences. Applying the theory on the different historical researches of all periods and aspects of historical science should be done without changing some of the key patterns of the historical study. In that context, the historian must not recede from the critical and thorough analyze of sources as well as literature. Therefore, any contemporary effort or scientific statement those historians ‘choose facts’ which will be then compiled into papers and works is to be rejected as ahistorical. Theory applying ought to be a step forward in studying different aspects of history. its’ crucial significance is helping historians to deliver a wider perspective of reading past and showing more broader overview of all aspects of human life, deed and behavior from the Ancient times up to contemporary periods. Neither should history be simply abstracted and turned into plain theory, nor should historians’ researches remain attached only to the artless, unassuming numbering of facts without any deeper attempts of understanding the past.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barzun, Jacques (1974): Clio and the Doctors, Chicago University press, Chicago

Black, Jeremy, MacRaild, Donald M (2007): Palgrave study skills. Studying history, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke-New York

Carr, Edward Hallett (1987) What Is History?, The George Macaulay Trevelyan Lectures Delivered in the University of Cambridge January-March 1961, Penguin Books, London

Cartledge, Paul (2004): What is Social History Now?, What is History Now Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke-New York

Day, Mark (2008): The Philosophy of History, Continuum, London-New York

Elton, Geoffrey Rudolph (1991): Return to Essentials - Some Reflections on the Present State of Historical Stud, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Elton, Geoffrey Rudolph (2002): The Practice of History, Afterword by Richard J. Evans, Victoria, Malden MA-Oxford-Carlton

Evans, Richard J (2000): In defense of history, Granta books, London

Hofstadter, Richard (2009): Historians on History, History and the social sciences, in Tosh, John (ed.), Second edition, Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh Gate

Jones, Gareth Stedman (1976): From historical sociology to theoretical history, British Journal of Sociology XXVII, London

Jordanova, Ludmilla (2006): History in practice, Hodder Arnold, London

Judt, Tony (1979): A clown in regal purple, social history and the historians. History Workshop Jorunal VII, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Kraditor, Aileen S (1972): American radical historians on their heritage, Past and Present LVI, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Le Roy Ladurie, Émanuel (1973): Le territoire de l’historien, Tome 1, Gallimard, Paris

Le Roy Ladurie, Émanuel (1973): Le territoire de l’historien, Tome 2, Gallimard, Paris

Marković, Saša (2015): Hipokrizija kao pretendent na arhetip nedorečenog u političkoj misli kod Srba, Srpska politička misao 47(1), Beograd

Marwick, Arthur (2001): The New Nature of History, Knowledge, Evidence, Language, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke-New York

Mathias, Peter (1971): Living with the neighbours, the role of the economic history, Collected Inaugural Lectures 1893-1970, The Study of Economic History, Frank Cass and company Ltd, London

Мичел, Стивен (2007): Историја позног Римског царства, CLIO, Београд

Thomson, David (1969): The aims of history, values of the historical attitude, Thames & Hudson, London

Tosh, John (2010): The pursuit of history, Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh Gate

Conkin, Paul K (1977); Intellectual history : past, present, and future, Future of history, Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville

Downloads

Published

2017-03-31

How to Cite

Savin , M. ., & Starović, N. . (2017). THEORETICAL VIEW ON HISTORY. KULTURA POLISA, 14(32), 53–63. Retrieved from https://kpolisa.com/index.php/kp/article/view/667

Issue

Section

Monographic study

Metrics