THE INFLUENCE OF THE OPPORTUNITIES IN CROATIA ON THE EXERCISE OF PENSION INSURANCE LAW IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS COURT IN STRASBOURG

Authors

  • Aleksandar Božić Дом здравља „Др Младен Стојановић” Бачка Паланка
  • Damir Marković Републички фонд за здравствено осигурање Сомбор

Keywords:

Croatia, pensions, payments, Court, Convention, law

Abstract

Тhe aim of this paper is to show that the war events in Croatia from 1991 to 1995 affected the fact that a large number of persons did not have the opportunity to exercise pension rights and what kind of decision was made by the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg . A large number of persons can not enjoy the right to retirement at the time of the war and immediately afterwards. The European Court of Human Rights, in its decision on the application against Croatia, declared the application inadmissible. On the basis of the Court's decision, these persons did not get the possibility of paying them pensions that they did not receive during the war. A large number of persons are still prevented from exercising their right to payment of pensions for a certain period of time, even though they paid contributions to the Croatian Pension Fund. It should be emphasized that the Court applied in the adoption of the Decision other than domestic law and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms with additional protocols. In order to arrive at a conclusion that the Court rendered a decision declaring the request on this issue inadmissible, it is also necessary to analyze how the Court interpreted the relevant domestic law, which is also learned in this paper.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Međunarodni ugovori, „Službeni list SRJ”, br. 1/01

Međunarodni ugovori, „Narodne novine Republike Hrvatske”, broj 18/97

„Narodne novine Socijalističke Republike Hrvatske” broj 23/83

„Narodne novine Socijalističke Republike Hrvatske” broj 49/83

„Narodne novine Socijalističke Republike Hrvatske” broj 57/86

„Narodne novine Republike Hrvatske” broj 40/90

''Narodne novine Republike Hrvatske” broj 104/97

„Narodne novine Republike Hrvatske” broj 102/98

Odluka Komisije u predmetu Miler protiv Austrije, br. 5849/72 od 01. 10 1975.godine, Odluke i izveštaji 3, str. 25, i u predmetu Domalevski protiv Poljske (izveštaj.), br. 34610/97, ESLЈP 1999-V, str. 582, 583

Bogdanović, Tamara (2011): Zaštita prava vlasništva iz članka 1. Protokola 1. Europske Konvencije u praksi Upravnog suda Republike Hrvatske, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Rijeci, br. 1, str.583-598

https//www.bgcentar.org.rs/ratione-temporis/ (17.05.2018.)

https://www.echr.coe.int/ (13.05.2018.)

https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_SRP.pdf, (12. 05. 2018.)

https://uredzastupnika.gov.hr/vijesti/...presuda...protiv-hrvatske/3 (18. 05. 2018.)

https//www.mirovinsko.hr/UserDocsImages/publikacije/114-121.pdf, (18. 05. 2018.)

https://www.hrw.org/legacy/backgrounder/eca/croatia0504/2.htm (18. 05. 2018.)

Downloads

Published

2019-10-02

How to Cite

Božić , A. ., & Marković, D. . (2019). THE INFLUENCE OF THE OPPORTUNITIES IN CROATIA ON THE EXERCISE OF PENSION INSURANCE LAW IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS COURT IN STRASBOURG. KULTURA POLISA, 16(38), 577–588. Retrieved from https://kpolisa.com/index.php/kp/article/view/312

Issue

Section

Review Article

Categories

Metrics