The Position of Human Rights Within the Framework of the International Legal Order
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51738/kpolisa.2025.2r.005Keywords:
human rights, theoretical concepts, application, limitations, legal instrumentsAbstract
Human rights achieved their fu l a firmation in the period fo lowing the Second World War. Although the origins of the idea of incorporating human rights into the international legal order date back much earlier, their legal validation is primarily associated with legal instruments adopted under the auspices of the United Nations. Consequently, their specific features must be assessed in light of the normative solutions contained in the core international legal instruments. This paper wi l employ a broad methodological framework, with emphasis on the comparative method, historical method, content analysis, systematic approach, linguistic analysis of legal texts, among others. The application of these methods wi l be directed towards a better understanding of the various legal solutions which, in certain respects, exhibit significant differences. The paper wi l provide a general definition and understanding of human rights, the development of the idea of human rights at the level of legal theory, the possibility of their lawful limitation, the current state of their practical implementation, and related issues. Recognizing the importance of the practical application of human rights, the paper wi l refer to judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. Particular attention wi l be paid to the judgments in which the Republic of Serbia was found to have violated human rights through various forms of conduct by state authorities. The aim of the paper is to present the field of human rights in a manner that enables the reader to properly understand their legal specificities. This aim is considered justified in circumstances where the phenomenon of human rights is widely exploited in the media across the world, often accompanied by inaccurate assessments of their scope in the practical application of legal provisions.
Downloads
References
Bjelajac, Ž. (2017). Ljudska bezbednost sagledana kroz prizmu ljudskih prava i savremenih pretnji [Human Security Through a Prism of Human Rights and Contemporary threats]. Кultura polisa, 14(33), 139–154.
Budak, A. (2018). Adequacy of the Concept of Human Rights. Colection of Papers of the Faculty of Law in Niš, LVII (80), 559–576.
Ćirić, J. (2000). Anti-Humanism of the Ideology of Human Rights. Sociological Review, 34(1–2), 69–88.
Ćorić, S. (2009). “Critique” of Robert Walter Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. Co lection of Papers of the Faculty of Law in Novi Sad, XLIII(1), 249–259.
Cvetković, A. (2024). Possibilities of Referendum in Consociational Democracy. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade, 72(2), 309–337.
Dobrijević, A. (2011). Contractualism versus Contractarianism. Philosophy and Society, 22(3), 27–44.
Gajin, S. (2012). Human Rights (Legal-System Framework). Belgrade: Faculty of Law, Union University in Belgrade.
Joksić, I. (2011). Criminal Law Protection of the Environment in Legislation and Practice. In A. Čavoški, A. Knežević Bojović (eds.), Ecology and Law (20–32). Institute of Comparative Law & Faculty of Law, UNION University in Belgrade.
Kalik, M. (2018). The Relevance of Marx’s Thought, Communist Ideas, and the Revolutionary Ideals of ’68 Today. Communications, Media, Culture, 10(10), 53–96.
Kelzen, H. (2007). Pure Theory of Law. Belgrade: Faculty of Law, University of Belgrade.
Kolednjak, M. & Šantalab, M. (2013). Third-Generation Human Rights. Technical Gazette, 7(3), 322–328.
Kovačević, M. (2023). Prevention of Hate Speech in the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Megatrend Review, 20(2), 79–92.
Krivokapić, B. (2017). The Concept of Human Rights. Foreign Legal Life, (1), 9–20.
Milanović, J. (2023). The Concept of Law and Justice in the Work of Hans Kelsen. Legal Horizons, 6(7), 21–36.
International Legal Instruments and ECHR Judgments: Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948, December 10) 217 (III).
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966, December 16) 2200 A (XXI).
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966, December 16) 2200 A (XXI). European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950, November 4) CETS No. 194.
CASE IVIĆ v. SERBIA (Application no. 17871/23), Judgment, Strasbourg, 13 February 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Goran Milojevic, Dejan Novaković

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.