KARL POPPER AND DARWINISM

Authors

  • Marko Škorić Универзитет у Новом Саду Филозофски факултет Нови Сад

Keywords:

Karl Popper, falsificationism, theory of evolution and natural selection, Darwinism as metaphyscial researh program, Darwinism as scientific theory

Abstract

Karl Popper is one of the greatest philosophers of twentieth century and his influence on philosophy of science is obvious and immense. However, his thinking about evolution and Darwinism was mistaken throughout his whole career, despite some changes. He never fully understood the true nature of the theory of natural selection and that is why he didn't see it as a genuine scientific theory but as a metaphysical research program. In this paper it is argued that the Darwinian theory of evolution is genuine scientific theory and that it can be tested, that it is not tautology and that it makes falsifiable predictions and retrodictions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baldwin, J. M. (1909a). Darwin and the Humanities. Baltimore: Review Publishing.

Baldwin, J. M. (1909b). The influence of Darwin on theory of knowledge and philosophy. Psychological Review 16 (3): 207-218.

Bartley, W. W. (1976). The philosophy of Karl Popper, part I: Biology & evolutionary epistemology. Philosophia 6 (3-4): 463-494.

Bartley, W. W. (1987). Philosophy of biology versus philosophy of physics. In: G. Radnitzky and W. W. Bartley III (eds), Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 7-45.

Bradie, M. (1986). Assessing evolutionary epistemology. Biology and Philosophy 1 (4): 401-459.

Bradie, M. (1996). Taking Popper seriously. Biology and Philosophy 11 (2): 259-270.

Brandon, R. N. (1980). A structural description of evolutionary theory. PSA, vol. II: 427-439.

Braude, S. (1997). The predictive power of evolutionary biology and the discovery of eusociality in the naked mole rat. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 17 (4): 12-15.

Campbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In: Schilpp (1974), pp. 413-463.

Campbell, D. T. (1997). From evolutionary epistemology via selection theory to a sociology of scientific validity. Evolution and Cognition 3 (1): 5-38.

Cole, J. R. (1981). Misquoted scientists respond. Creation/Evolution Journal 2 (4): 34-44.

Dawkins, R. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Inc.

Dawkins, R. (2009). The Greatest Show On Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. New York: Free Press.

Darwin, C. (1859/1964). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (facs. ed. of 1st Edition). Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.

Dennett, D. C. (1979). The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism by Karl R. Popper and John C. Eccles. The Journal of Philosophy 76 (2): 91-97.

Fleck, L. (1935/1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. (Edited by T. J. Trenn and R. K. Merton.) Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Futuyma, D. J. (1982). Science on Trial: The Case for Evolution. New York: Pantheon Books.

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003). Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Halstead, B. (1980). Popper: Good philosophy, bad science? New Scientist 87 (1210): 215-217.

Hull, D. L. (1973). Darwin and His Critics: The Reception of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution by the Scientific Community. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Hull, D. L. (1999). The use and abuse of Sir Karl Popper. Biology and Philosophy 14 (4): 481-504.

Isaak, M. (n.d.). Index to creationist claims. http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html. Pristupljeno 31.7.2012.

Kitcher, P. (1982). Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.

Kranz, R. (n.d.). Karl Popper's challenge. http://www.creationism.org/csshs/v02n4p20.htm. Pristupljeno 31. 7. 2012.

Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91-195.

Laudan, L. (1983). The demise of the demarcation problem. In: R. S. Cohen and L. Laudan (eds), Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing, pp. 111-127.

Lewontin, R. C. (1961). Evolution and the theory of games. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1 (3): 382-403.

Lewontin, R. C. (1969). The bases of conflict in biological explanation. Journal of the History of Biology 2 (1): 35-45.

Lewontin, R. C. (1970). The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1-18.

Lewontin, R. C. (1972). Testing the theory of natural selection. Nature 236 (5343): 181-182.

Mayr, E. (1984). What is Darwinism today? PSA, vol. II: 145-156.

Mayr, E. (1997). This is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Cambridge and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Mayr, E. (2000). Darwin's influence on modern thought. Scientific American 283 (1): 79-83.

Panchen, A. L. (1992). Classification, Evolution and the Nature of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Peters, R. H. (1976). Tautology in evolution and ecology. The American Naturalist 110 (971): 1-12.

Platnick, N. I. (1977a). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Systematic Zoology 26 (3): 361-363.

Platnick, N. I. (1977b). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Systematic Zoology 26 (3): 363-365.

Platnick, N. I. and E. S. Gaffney (1978). Evolutionary biology: A Popperian perspective. Systematic Zoology 27 (1): 138-141.

Popper, K. R. (1934/2002). Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge.

Popper, K. R. (1940). What is dialectic? Mind 49 (196): 403-426.

Popper, K. R. (1944a). The poverty of historicism, I. Economica 11 (42): 86-103.

Popper, K. R. (1944b). The poverty of historicism, II. Economica 11 (43): 119-137.

Popper, K. R. (1945). The poverty of historicism, III. Economica 12 (46): 69-89.

Popper, K. R. (1945/1947). The Open Society and Its Enemies, 2 vols. London: Routledge & Sons.

Popper, K. R. (1956/1982). Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics. From the Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery. Edited by W. W. Bartley, III. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.

Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Popper, K. R. (1974a). Replies to my critics. In: Schilpp (1974), pp. 961-1197.

Popper, K. R. (1974b). Scientific reduction and the essential incompleteness of all science. In: F. J. Ayala and T. Dobzhansky (eds), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology: Reduction and Related Problems. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 259-284.

Popper, K. R. (1974/2002). Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. Routledge: London and New York.

Popper, K. R. (1975). The rationality of scientific revolutions. In: R. Harre (ed.), Problems of Scientific Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 72-101.

Popper, K. R. (1978). Natural selection and the emergence of mind. Dialectica 32 (3-4): 339-355.

Popper, K. R. (1980). Evolution. New Scientist 87 (1215): 611.

Popper, K. R. (1990). A World of Propensities. Bristol: Thoemmes.

Ridley, M. (2004). Evolution, Third Edition. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Ruse, M. (1977). Karl Popper’s philosophy of biology. Philosophy of Science 44 (4): 638-661.

Sarton, G. (1948). The Life of Science: Essays in the History of Civilization. New York: Henry Schuman.

Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) (1974). The Philosophy of Karl Popper, 2 vols. La Salle: Open Court.

Settle, T. (1996). Six things Popper would like biologists not to ignore: In memoriam, Karl Raimund Popper, 1902-1994. Biology and Philosophy 11 (2): 141-159.

Simmel, G. (1895/1982). On a relationship between the theory of selection and epistemology. In: H. C. Plotkin (ed.), Learning, Development, and Culture. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 63-71.

Sober, E. (2000). Philosophy of Biology, Second Edition. Boulder: Westview Press.

Sonleitner, F. J. (1986). What did Karl Popper really say about evolution? Creation/Evolution Journal 6 (2): 9-14.

Stamos, D. N. (1996). Popper, falsifiability, and evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy 11 (2): 161-191.

Stamos, D. N. (2007). Popper, laws, and the exclusion of biology from genuine science. Acta Biotheoretica 55 (4): 357-375.

Stephens, C. (2007). Natural selection. In: M. Matthen and C. Stephens (eds), Philosophy of Biology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 111-128.

Škorić, M. (2005). Darvinizam kao konceptualna revolucija: Problem kosmičke teleologije. U: M. Tripković (ur.), Religija u multikulturnom društvu. Novi Sad i Beograd: Filozofski fakultet i Sociološko društvo Srbije, str. 163-183.

Škorić, M. (2010). Sociologija nauke: mertonovski i konstruktivistički programi. Sremski Karlovci i Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.

Škorić, M. i A. Kišjuhas (2012). Evolucija i prirodna selekcija: od Anaksimandra do Darvina. U štampi.

Watkins, J. (1996/2007). Popper and darwinism. In: E. Suárez-Iñiguez (ed.), The Power of Argumentation. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, pp. 101-116.

Watkins, J. (1997). Karl Raimund Popper, 1902-1994. Proceedings of the British Academy 94: 645-684.

Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Wittgenstein, L. (1921/1961). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Downloads

Published

2012-10-31

How to Cite

Škorić, M. . (2012). KARL POPPER AND DARWINISM. KULTURA POLISA, 9(19), 215–242. Retrieved from https://kpolisa.com/index.php/kp/article/view/1329

Issue

Section

Monographic study

Metrics