• Dag Kolarević Криминалистичко-полицијска академија Београд
  • Miroslav Paunović Полицијска управа за град Београд МУП РС


robbery, robbery trend, the time of the robbery, the city commission of robbery, robbery offenders, victims of robbery, multidimensional scaling


In order to determine the characteristics of the crime of criminal robberies, empirical research was conducted, covering 227 solved criminal cases of robbery, committed by 100 perpetrators. The offenses were committed in the period 2009-2015. in the area of Police Station Zemun. The research was carried out by direct inspection of manual and electronic official records of the Police Station Zemun. In addition to descriptive statistical measures the technique of multidimensional scaling was applied, to achieve insight into the structural features of the robbery.

Research has shown varying trend of crimes. Robberies have shown a considerable increase in the autumn and winter months. Observed by parts of the day, most frequent period was between 18-24 hours. Object of the attack are usually different commercial buildings. Robberies are usually commited with guns and knives, along with direct access to the victim and threat. In little more than two thirds of cases the perpetrators use masks. Robberies are commited mainly by younger or middle age men, which generally have no permanent employment and regular source of income. Particularly worrying is the fact that more than one-fifth of offenders are juvenile offenders. 80% of perpetrators had previously been reported. The largest number of victims were female. Robberies are usually committed against an individual, while the resistance of the victim during the commission of the crime is rare.

The results of multidimensional scaling showed a clear distinction between the perpetrators in terms of the use of force. One group consists of violent perpetrators who attack men causing resistance, escape and injury of victims. The second group consists of non violent perpetrators and their targets are usually women; during commision they use weapons, not using verbal threats, have been recorded in the police earlier and make confessions when they are caught.


Download data is not yet available.


Alison, L., Canter, D. (2000): Profiling property crimes, Ashgate Pub Ltd, Surrey.

Banović B., (2002): Kriminološko-kriminalistički aspekti krivičnog dela razbojništva, Delikti nasilja, Zbornik radova, Beograd.

Barclay G., Tavares, C. (2007): International comparison of criminal justice statistics 2001. Home Office Bulletin, 12(3).

Barnet, A., (1997): Robbery in South Australia, Office for Crime Statistics, Adelaide, June 1997.

Burrell A. et al., (2012): Linking Personal Robbery Offences Using Offender Behaviour, Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 9: 201–222.

Cook P. J., (1987): Robbery violence, Journal of criminal law & criminology Vol. 78, No. 2.

Deane G. et al., (2008): Not ‘Islands, Entire of Themselves’: Exploring the Spatial Context of City-level Robbery Rates, Journal of quantitative Criminology, 24, 363–380.

Đorđević Đ., (2002): Krivično delo razbojništva i uloga policije u njegovoj prevenciji, Mesto i uloga policije u prevenciji kriminaliteta, Zbornik radova, Beograd.

FBI - Criminal Justice Information Services Division, (2016): Robbery, Types of Weapons Used, Crime in the United States.

Giorgi G. et al., (2015): Distress and job satisfaction after robbery assaults: a longitudinal study, Occupational Medicine, 65:290–295.

Goodwill A. M. et al., (2012): Multidimensional Latent Classification of ‘Street Robbery’ Offences, Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 9: 93– 109.

Guttman, L. (1968): A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points, Psychometrica, Volume 33, 4, 469–506.

Hansen M., Elklit A., (2011): Predictors of acute stress disorder in response to bank robbery, European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 2: 5864

Knežić B., Jovanović S., (2003): Razbojništva i razbojničke krađe, Temida, Beograd.

Marinković, D., Lajić, O., (2016): Kriminalistička metodika, Kriminalističko-policijska akademija, Beograd.

Marinković, D., Otašević, B., (2011): Droge i kriminal – kriminološko-kriminalistički aspekti, Suprotstavljanje savremenom organizovanom kriminalu i korupciji (knjiga I), Zbornik radova, Kriminalističko-policijska akademija, Beograd, 275-293.

Milić, N. (2015): Neke mogućnosti analize geoprostorne distribucije krivičnih dela u radu policije, NBP- Journal of criminalistics and law, 20, 99-117.

Mumola C. J., Karberg J.C., (2014): Drug Use and Dependence, State and Federal Prisoners, Washington, U.S. Department of Justice.

Neumayer, E., (2005): Inequality and violent crime: evidence from data on robbery and violent theft, Journal of peace research, 42 (1), 101-112.

Pfeiffer-Gerschel T et. al., (2008): Germany - New Developments, Trends and In- Depth Information on Selected Issues, Drug Situation 2006/2007, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.

Smith, J., (2003): The nature of personal robbery (Report no. 254). London, UK, Home Office.

Zdravković, Lj. (2008:219): Krivično delo razbojništva u kriminalističkoj i sudskoj praksi, Niš, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu.




How to Cite

Kolarević, D. . ., & Paunović, M. . (2017). EXPLORING FORENSICALLY RELEVANT CHARACTERISTICS OF ROBBERIES. KULTURA POLISA, 14(33), 155–176. Retrieved from https://kpolisa.com/index.php/kp/article/view/710



Monographic study