CONCURRENCE OF THE CRIME OF FORGERY AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH RELATED CRIMINAL ACTS
Keywords:
legal traffic, falsifying documents, related criminal offenses, relationshipAbstract
The object of protection to the criminal offenses of falsifying documents is the legal traffic. The legal traffic should be understood as the circulation of documents which prove the existence or non-existence of certain relationships between people, i.e. the existence of the rights and obligations arising from such relations, or which establish and define certain personal, statutory and other facts in these relations. The documents serve as a source of information and evidence, and therefore must be true so that the legal traffic can take place without suspicion and mistrust. The veracity of documents form the basis of trust in the legal traffic. Therefore jeopardizing that trust - creating a false or modified real documents, obtaining such documents with the intent to use as genuine, or using false or altered real documents - constitute the criminal offense of falsifying documents, in basic, qualified and specific forms of this criminal offense when it comes to the material forgery.
Legal traffic is the object of protection with intellectual forgery because the official documents, books or papers, evidence and sources of information about the existence or nonexistence of many conditions, rights and obligations of a large number of subjects, which are of particular importance for the legal and social relations in constant traffic. Confidence in their veracity and accuracy is the condition of security in the performance of this traffic.
Downloads
References
Živanović, Toma (1936): Osnovi krivičnog prava Kraljevine Jugoslavije, Posebni deo, knj. 2, sv. 2, Beograd.
Zlatarić, Bogdan (1958): Krivični zakonik u praktičnoj primjeni, sv. 1, Zagreb.
Jovašević, Dragan (1995): Krivično delo falsifikovanja isprava, Doktorska disertacija, Beograd.
Krivični zakonik Republike Srbije, „Sl. glasnik RS“, br. 85/2005, 88/2005 - ispr., 107/2005 - ispr., 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013 i 108/2014.
Lazarević, Ljubiša (2006): Komentar Krivičnog zakonika Republike Srbije, Beograd.
Nešić, Ljubisav (1989): ”Osvrt na krivična dela falsifikovanja isprava i njihov odnos prema drugim krivičnim delima”, Časopis „Bezbednost“, Beograd, 4/1989.
Stojanović, Zoran (2006): Komentar Krivičnog zakonika Republike Srbije, Službeni glasnik, Beograd.
Stojanović, Zoran, Perić, Obrad (2007): Krivično pravo, Posebni deo, Beograd.
Tahović, Janko (1957): Komentar Krivičnog zakonika, Beograd.
Čejović, Boro (2008): Krivično pravo u sudskoj praksi, Posebni deo, Kragujevac.
Пресуде:
Presuda Kasacionog suda, Kre-267/36m od 19.05.1936.g.
Presuda Kasacionog suda, Kre-1264/37, od 07.10.1937.
Presuda Vrhovnog suda Srbije, Kž. 1792/53,
Presuda Drugog opštinskog suda u Beogradu K-1328/89 od 07.05.1990;
Presuda Okružnog suda u Beogradu, Kž-3354/90 od 05.02.1991;
Presuda Okružnog suda u Beogradu, Kž-257/08 od 06.02.2008. i Presuda Opštinskog suda u Lazarevcu, K-226/07 od 18. 09. 2007, Bilten Okružnog suda u Beogradu, 79/2009, str. 107.
Presuda Okružnog suda u Beogradu, Kž-845/97 od 22.04.1997 i presuda Drugog opštinskog suda u Beogradu, K-521/96 od 08.10.1996;
Presuda Okružnog suda u Beogradu, Kž-1726/98;
Presuda Okružnog suda u Beogradu, Kž-2209/91 od 13.09.1991 i presuda Petog opštinskog suda u Beogradu, K-620/90 od 03.06.1991;
Presuda Okružnog suda u Subotici, Kž-504/02.