POLITICS, SPACE, IDENTITY: QUESTION OF HETEROTOPY AND SOCIAL SPACIALIZATION / SPACIAL SOCIALIZATION
Keywords:
heterotopia, utopia, space, social spacijalization, spacial socialization, identityAbstract
This article analyzes the importance of the concepts of heterotopia and social spatialization/spatial socialization for understanding heterogeneous political strategies/discourses of power. In this respect, heterotopies are important because thay, unlike utopia, establish parallel realities with essential political implications. while social spatialization/spatial socialization, not only represents a spatial/territorial requirement of integration into some social entity, but also in that process implies the adoption of a narrative of common traditions.
Downloads
References
Allmendinger, P., Chilla, T. and Sielke, F. (2104) “Europeanizing territoriality—towards soft spaces”, Environment and Planning A, 46(11): 2703-2717.
Baudrillard, J. (1990 [1979]) Seduction. Montreal: New World Perspectives.
Bogard, W. (2006) “Surveillance assemblages and lines of flight”, Lyon, D. (ed) Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, pp. 97-123.
Bentham, J. (1991 [1787, 1791]) The Panopticon Writings. London: Verso.
Bevir, M. (2008) “What is Genealogy?”, Journal of the Philosophy of History, 2(3): 263–275.
Boyne, R. (2000) “Post-Panopticism”, Economy and Society, 29(2): 285-237.
Castello, L. (2010) Rethinking the Meaning of Place: Conceiving Place in ArchitectureUrbanism. Burlington: Ashgate.
Driver, F. (1985) “Power, Space, and the Body: A Critical Assessment of Foucault’s Discipline and Punish”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 3(4): 425–446.
Elden, S. (2001) Mapping the Present: Heidegger, Foucault and the Project of a Spatial History. London: Continuum.
Foucault, M. (1978) The History of Sexuality. Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1980) “The Confession of the Flesh”, in Gordon, C. (ed) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon, pp. 194-229.
Foucault, M. (1980a) “The Eye of Power”, in Gordon, C. (ed) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon, pp. 146-166.
Foucault, M. (1995 [1975]) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (2000a) “The Subject and Power”, in Rabinow, P. (ed) Power (The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984). Volume 3, New York: New Press, pp. 326-349.
Foucault M, (2002a [1969]) The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (2002b [1966]) The Order of Things An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (2000b) “Space, Knowledge, and Power”, in Rabinow, P. (ed) Power (The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984). Volume 3, New York: New Press, pp. 349-365.
Foucault, M. (2008 [1967]) “Of Other Spaces”, in Dehaene, M and De Cauter, L. (eds) Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society. New York: Routledge, pp.13–29.
Foucault, M. (2015) The Punitive Society: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1972-1973. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gregory, D. (1994) Geographical Imaginations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Haggerty, K. D. (2006) “Tear Down the Walls: On Demolishing the Panopticon”, Lyon, D. (ed) Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, pp. 23-46.
Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell D. and Vigar, G. (2010) The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries. London: Routledge.
Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P. and Oosterlynck, S. (2013) “Spaces of Neoliberal Experimentation: Soft Spaces, Postpolitics, and Neoliberal Governmentality”, Environment and Planning A, 45(1): 217-234.
Leimgruber, W. (1991) “Boundary, Values and Identity: The Swiss-Italian Transborder Region”, in Rumley, D. and Minghi, J. V. The Geography of Border Landscapes. New York: Routledge, pp. 43-63.
Lazarevic Radak, S. (2014) Nevidljivi Balkan: prilog istoriji postkolonijalnih geografija (Invisible Balkans: Contribution to the History of Postcolonial Geographies). Pančevo: Mali Nemo.
Leatherman, J. (2008) “Challenges to Authority in Global Politics”, in Leatherman, J. (ed) Discipline and Punishment in Global Politics: Illusions of Control. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-27.
Lyon, D. (2006) “The Search for Surveillance Theories”, Lyon, D. (ed) Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, pp. 3-21.
Paasi, A. (1986) “The Institutionalization of Regions: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Emergence of Regions and the Constitution of Regional Identity. Fennia, 164(1): 105-146.
Paasi, A. (1996) Territories, Boundaries, and Consciousness: The Changing Geographies of the Finnish-Russian Boundary. New York: J. Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Paasi, A. (1997) “Geographical perspectives on Finnish national identity”, GeoJournal, 43(1): 41–50.
Paasi, A. (2001) “Bounded Spaces in the Mobile World: Deconstructing Regional Identity”, Tidschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93(2): 137–148.
Paasi, A. (2011) “A Border Theory: An Unattainable Dream or a Realistic Aim for Border Scholars?”, in Wastl-Walter, D. (ed) The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies. Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 11–33.
Philo, C. (1992) “Foucault’s Geography”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 10(2): 137–161.
Shah, N. (2012) “The Territorial Trap of the Territorial Trap: Global Transformation and the Problem of the State’s Two Territories”, International Political Sociology, 6(1): 57- 76.
Shields, R. (1991) Places on the Margin: Alternative Geographies of Modernity. New York: Routledge.
Sohn, H. (2008) “Heterotopia: Anamnesis of a Medical Term”, in Dehaene, M and De Cauter, L. (eds) Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society. New York: Routledge, pp. 41–51.
West-Pavlov, R. (2009) Space in Theory: Kristeva, Foucault, Deleuze. Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi.
Zivkovic, M. (2011) Serbian Dreambook: National Imaginary in the Time of Milošević. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
