CONCEPTUAL THEORETICAL DILEMMAS OF PUNISHMENT
Keywords:
punishment, punishing, the theory of punishing, re-socialization, retribution, guerdon, re-educationAbstract
In this work, the authors deal with conceptual theoretical dilemmas which refer to the punishment. The authors, through a philosophical and legal approach, consider the essence of the punishment, its purpose, goal, justice, justification of the pronouncement and its influence on the correction of behavior, that is, the re-socialization of the convict himself. In contemporary criminal policy, it is increasingly seeked to raise the level of humanity and reduce the level of repression towards the perpetrators of criminal acts. However, by denying the repressive nature of the punishment and the character of retribution, done is practically abolished, and the criminal is approached as a patient who needs healing, so that in the future he would not exhibit the symptoms of the disease at the expense of others and himself. And while society’s part in the etiology of criminal behavior should not be negated, it must be borne in mind that criminality is not an illness in a medical sense of that word. With the fact that certain prohibited behavior is carried out consciously and with the knowledge of legally determined consequences, punishment is the answer to the impudence of a criminal who denies the importance of social norms, negates other people's rights and sets the state of self-will.
Downloads
References
Bentham, J. (1781). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation, History of Economic Thought Books.
Bojanić, I., Mrčela, M., (2006). Svrha kažnjavanja u kontekstu šeste novele Kaznenog zakona, Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, vol. 13, br. 2, str. 431-449.
Cottingham, J., (1979). Varieties of retribution, The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), vol. 29, no. 116, pp. 238-246.
Ellis, A. (2014). Theories of Punishment, In Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice Springer, New York, pp. 5184-5192.
Flew, A., (1969).The Justification of Punishment. u H. B. Acton (ed.), The Philosophy of Punishment, Macmillan, London: Macmillan, pp. 83-104.
Gendin, S. (1967). The Meaning of Punishment, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 235-240.
Gillin, J. L. (1971). Criminology and penology. Greenwood.
Goldman, A., (1995). Paradox of punishment, U: Simmons, J. i sar. (ur.) Punishment. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Kaufman, A. S. (1959). Anthony Quinton on Punishment, Analysis, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 10-13.
Kaufman, W. R., (2012). Honor and revenge: a theory of punishment, Springer Science & Business Media.
Kolber, A. (2009). Subjective experience of punishment, Columbia Law Review, no. 109, pp. 182-236.
Mabbott, J. D., (1969). Punishment, u H. B. Acton (ed.), The Philosophy of Punishment, Macmillan, London.
McCloskey, H. J. (1967). Utilitarian and retributive punishment. The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 91-110;
McCloskey, H. J., (1963). A note on utilitarian punishment.Mind,1.
Medić, D., Tajić, H., (2008). Nematerijalna šteta u praksi, Privredna Štampa, Sarajevo.
Menninger, K.., (1988). Therapy, Not Punishment, u (eds.) Baird R. M., Rosenbaum S. E., Philosophy of Punishment, Contemporary Issues in Philosophy, Prometheus Books, New York.
Mrvić-Petrović, N., Ćirić, J., Počuča, M. (2015). Medical expertise in criminal and civil proceedings. Vojnosanitetski pregled, vol. 72, br. 8, pp. 729-734.
Pavlovic, Z., Markovic, M., Petkovic, N., Djordjevic, M., (2012). Medical expertise in criminal procedure De lege lata et de lege ferenda, HEALTHMED, vol. 6, no. 9, pp.3202-3209.
Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explanations, Harvard University Press.
Pifferi, M. (2016). Reinventing Punishment. A Comparative History of Criminology and Penology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries Oxford University Press, pp. 1-305.
Sokol, T. (2004). Retributivizam, utilitarizam i prevencija u filozofiji kažnjavanja uz poseban osvrt na grčku filozofiju, njemački klasični idealizam i Benthamov relativizam, Pravnik, Law & Society Review, vol. 38, br. 78, str. 89-109.
Thompson, K., Vranić, I., Đorđević, J., (2003). Moralna panika, Clio, Beograd.
Quinton, A., (1969). On Punishment, u H. B. Acton (ed.), The Philosophy of Punishment, Macmillan, London, pp. 55-64.
Bjelajac, Ž., Merdović B., (2018). Senzacionalizam u medijima kao uzrok destabilizacije politike suzbijanja kriminaliteta, Kultura polisa, vol. 15, br. 35, str. 289-300.
Vasiljević-Prodanović, D., (2011). Teorije kažnjavanja i njihove penološke implikacije, Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija, vol. 10, br. 3, str. 509-525.
Dragojlović, J., (2016). Uslovna osuda i novčana kazna, Kultura polisa, vol. 13, br. 32, str. 497-507.
Dragojlović, J., (2016). Odnos uslovne osude i kazne, Kultura polisa, vol. 13, br. 31, str. 501-509.
Kant, I. (1981). Zasnivanje metafizike morala, BIGZ, Beograd.
Kant, I., (2008). Zasnivanje metafizike morala, Dereta, Beograd.
Lazarević, Lj. (2006). Komentar Krivičnog zakonika Republike Srbije, Savremena administracija, Beograd.
Milevski, V. A. (2014). Etička analiza savremenih teorija kazne: između utilitarističkog i retributivnog opravdanja kazne - doktorska disertacija, Filozofski fakultet, Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Petković, K. (2011). Kažnjava li neoliberalna kaznena država siromašne?, Političke analize, vol. 2, br. 7, str. 50-53.
Petković, N. (2017). Stid i krivica kao efektivni činioci kažnjavanja, Izvod iz usmenog izlaganja na stručnom skupu, Novi Sad.
Stojanović, Z. (2012). Komentar Krivičnog zakonika, Službeni glasnik, Beograd.
