INDIVIDUALLY ASPECTS OF JUSTIFYING AND DISPYTES OF THE INSTITUTE OF PLEA BARGAINING OF MINOR OFFENCE
Keywords:
plea bargaining, positive-legal prediction, justification of existence, denial of existenceAbstract
The existence of legal preconditions under which circumstances it is possible to conclude plea bargaining in addition to the elements related to the will of the parties to conclude an agreement, reflected through the initiation of negotiations, accepting misdemeanor responsibilities and reaching an agreement on the amount and type of misdemeanor sanction, raises many questions of the professional public which relate to justifying or challenging this positive law institute. The aim of this research is to point out and consider some of the positive and negative aspects of the plea bargaining that have arisen both from theoretical and practical considerations of this issue, although the expert public often views its views on justification, but also on the controversy of this institute from the angle of the criminal rights, and much less from the angle of the violation. The work is essentially divided into two parts that directly derive from the very name of this research, all in order to achieve a complete focus.
Downloads
References
Bingulac, Nenad, Malešić, Slobodan, Komparativni prikaz instituta sporazuma o priznanju prekršaja u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama, Nemačkoj i Srbiji, Kultura polisa, br.36, godina XV, 2018, str. 611-622.
Brkić, Snežana, Racionalizacija krivičnog postupka i uprošćene procesne forme, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu, 2004.
Bajović, Vanja, Sporazum o priznanju krivice, Magistarska teza, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, 2008.
Vidić, Milica, Sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela sa osvrtom na uporednopravna rešenja, Institut za pravo i finansije, 2013, preuzeto sa: http://ipf.rs/sporazum-opriznanju-krivicnog-dela-sa-osvrtom-na-uporednopravna-resenja/, 15.10.2015.
Evropska konvencija o ljudskim pravima, Evropski sud za ljudska prava, Savet evrope
Zakon o organizaciji i nadležnosti državnih organa u postupku za ratne zločine, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 67/2003, 135/2004, 61/2005, 101/2007 i 104/2009.
Zakon o organizaciji i nadležnosti državnih organa u postupku za ratne zločine, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 67/2003, 135/2004, 61/2005, 101/2007, 104/2009, 101/2011 – dr. zakon i 6/2015.
Zakonik o krivičnom postupku, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 72/2011, 101/2011, 121/2012, 32/2013, 45/2013 i 55/2014.
Milovanović, Miloš, Sporazum o priznanju krivice – pro et contra, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, vol. 58, br. 2, 2010, str. 415–431.
Prekršajni apelacioni sud u Beogradu, Saopštenje za javnost, preuzeto sa: http://pkap.sud.rs/prekrsajni-apelacioni-sud-saopstenja-za-javnost.html, 07.07.2018.
Radulović, Drago, Efikasnost krivičnog postupka i njen uticaj na suzbijanje kriminaliteta, u Zborniku ,,Realne mogućnosti krivičnog zakonodavstva u suzbijanju kriminaliteta“, Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju Jugoslavije, Beograd, 1997, str. 155–207.
Sandefur, Timothy, In defense of plea bargaining, Law regulation, no. 3, 2003, 28–31.
Turanjanin, Veljko, Uvođenje adversarnog sistema u Rusiji kroz prikaz dva najvažnija instituta – porotu i sporazum o priznanju krivice, Glasnik prava, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu, 2011.
Chernyakov, Daniil, Plea bargain as a tool to combat economic crime, Russian Law Online, 2010, preuzeto sa: www.russianlawonline.com/content/plea-bargain-toolcombat-economic-crime, 15.10.2015.
Škulić, Milan, Krivično procesno pravo – opšti deo, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, 2007.
