THE INFLUENCE OF PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES ON THE COMMISSION OF THE CRIME OF ROBBERY
Keywords:
robbery, psychoactive substances, drugs, motivation, targets / objects, crime preventionAbstract
Robberies are the most serious crimes in the group of criminal offenses against property. Their specificity in relation to other criminal acts against property is precisely in their complexity, which is determined by the significance of the protected property (object of protection), the frequency, extent and intensity of the resulting consequences. A significant number of acts are performed by those who are the primary stimulant factor in the drug. The aim of this research was to examine the drug's impact on the robbery, its frequency and the possible behavior of the perpetrator in various circumstances in the execution of this criminal offense. The research was designed as a cross section study. The sample consisted of 120 perpetrators of the criminal offense of Robbery and severe cases of robbery and robbery, who were in the Sremska Mitrovica Penitentiary for serving the sentence of imprisonment. The data was collected by anonymous interviewing. The results show that a significant number of perpetrators, as permanent addicts, commit the aforementioned offenses under the influence of psychoactive substances. Also, in specific situations that may occur during the commission of the aforementioned criminal offenses, they are more willing to give up their execution than those who are not dependent on any substance.
Downloads
References
Akerstrom, Malin. (1985): Crooks and Squares: Lifestyle of Thieves and Addicts in Comparison to Conventional People, New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Transaction Publishers
Banović, Božidar (2002): Kriminalističko-kriminološki aspekti krivičnog dela razbojništva, U: Delikti nasilja: krivičnopravni i kriminološki aspekt, Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, 271–288.
Bennett, Trevor, Holloway, Katy and Farrington, David (2008): The statistical association between drug misuse and crime: A meta-analysis, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(2), 107–118.
Braković, Žarko (2012): Uporedna analiza razbojništva u nekim zemljama Evrope i Republici Srbiji, Evropsko zakonodavstvo, 42, 69–92.
Bushman, J. Brad and Cooper, M. Harris (1990): Effects of alcohol on human aggression: An integrative research review, Psychological Bulletin, 107(3), 341–354.
Brookman, Fiona et al, (2007): Gender, Motivation and the Accomplishment of Street Robbery in the United Kingdom, The British Journal of Criminology, 47(6), 861–884.
Van Koppen, J. Peter and Jansen, J.W. Robert (1998): The Road to the Robbery: Travel Patterns in Commercial Robberies, The British Journal of Criminology, 38(2), 230–246.
Goldstein, J. Paul (1985): The Drugs/Violence Nexus: A Tripartite Conceptual Framework, Journal of Drug Issues, 15(4), 493–506.
Dvoršek, Anton (2002): Značaj kriminalističke strategije za prevenciju kriminaliteta, U: Mesto i uloga policije u prevenciji kriminaliteta – stanje, mogućnosti i perspektive, Policijska akademija, Beograd, 75–88.
Jacobs, A. Bruce and Wright, Richard (1999): Stick-up, street culture and offender motivation, Criminology, 37(1), 149–174.
Jupp, Victor (1989): Methods of Criminological Research, Routledge, London and New York.
Miller, Jody (1998): Up it up: Gender and thr accomplishment of street robbery, Crimonology, 36(1), 37–66.
Piotrowski, Przemyslaw (2011): Street robbery offenders: Shades of rationality and reversal theory perspective, Rationality and Society, 23(4), 427–451.
Sagalin, Arnold and Litlle, D. Arthur (1971): The Crime of Robbery in the United States, U.S. Department of Justice Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Preuzeto sa internet adrese: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/142484NCJRS.pdf, pristupljeno: 28.04.2013.
Seivewright, Nicholas, McMahon, Charles and Egleston, Paul (2005): Stimulant use still going strong, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 11(4), 262–269.
Feeney, Floyd and Weir, Andrianne (1975): The Prevention and Control of Robbery, Criminology, 13(1), 102–105.
Hochstetler, Andy (2001): Opportunities and Decisions: Interactional Dynamics in Robbery and Burglary, Crimonology, 39(3), 737–764.
Cromwell, F. Paul., Olson, N. James and Avary, Wester D’Aunn (1991): Breaking and Entering: An Ethnographic Analysis of Burglary, Newbury Park, Calif: Sage, USA.
Crow, Iain (2006): Researching Criminology, Open University Press, New York, USA.
Chaiken M. Jan., Chaiken, R. Marcia Peterson, E. Joyce (1982): Varieties of Criminal Behavior: Summary and Policy Implication, The National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice. Preuzeto sa internet adrese: http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reports/2007/R2814.pdf, pristupljeno: 05.05.2013.
Wolcott, D. G., (1965): A Typology of Armed Robbers, Master of Arts Thesis, Sacramento State College
Wright, Richard., Brookman, Fiona and Bennett, Trevor (2006): The Foreground Dynamics of Street Robbery in Britain, The British Journal of Criminology, 46(1), 1–15.