SOCIAL SOLUTIONS FOR SPATIAL PROBLEMS OR SPATIAL SOLUTIONS FOR SOCIAL PROBLEMS?
Keywords:
slam, urbanization, industrialization, urban planners, citizens, actors, urban renewalAbstract
Тhe paper sets outs to problematize relationship between the spatial (urban) and social solutions for the slums, settlements, within which are incorporated key issues of urban societies-overpopulation, lack of space, poverty, hunger, unemployment, crime, vices. In the paper are exposed social theories which make contribution to understanding structural causes for the emergence of slums and structural solutions for this problem, as well as different urban strategies for solving the problem of slums based on the displacement of the population. It is concluded that the only possible solution is a synthesis of spatial and social aspects of slums by means of cooperation between actors of the urban phenomenon-citizens, political actors, urban planners and economic organizations.
Downloads
References
Basan, M. (2001). Za obnovu urbane sociologije, jedanaest teza. Sociologija, XLIII (4): 347-352..
Boyer, R. G. (1998). The Historical Background of the Communist Manifesto. The Journal of Economic Perspectives (12) 4:151-174.
Engels, F. (1977). Veliki gradovi. U knjizi: F. Engels (ur.), Položaj radničke klase u Engleskoj, Beograd: Prosveta, str. 33-75.
Fridrih, J. (2005). Da li siromašni delovi grada čine lokalno stanovništvo siromašnijim?. U knjizi: S. Vujović i M. Petrović (ur), Urbana sociologija, Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva, str. 263-271.
Fyhr, K. (2012). Participation in Upgrading of Informal Settlements, Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Gidens, E. (2003). Gradovi i urbana područja, U knjizi: E. Gidens, Sociologija, Beograd: Ekonomski fakultet, str. 583-611.
Greene, J. S. (2003). Staged Cities: Mega-events, Slum Clearance, and Global Capital. Yale Human Rights and Development Journal 6 (1): 1-29.
Harvey, D. (2003). Neoliberalizam i grad. Diskrepancija 10 (14-15): 93-104.
Harvey, D. (2003a). Pravo na grad. Diskrepancija 10 (14-15):88-92.
Himmelfarb, G. (1983). Engels in Manchester: Inventing the Proleteriat. The American Scholar 52 (4): 479-496.
Lazarević, Lj. (2011). Čikaška škola socijalne ekologije. Globus 36 (1): 35-52.
Lefevr, A. (2005). Grad i urbano. U knjizi: S. Vujović i M. Petrović (ur), Urbana sociologija, Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva, str. 165-171.
Lefevr,A. (1980). Teorija prostora. Treći Program, 45: 569-582.
Lowe, S. and B. Tunstall (2012). Breaking up communities? The social impact of haousing demolition in the late twentieth century, York:University of York.
Mirkov, A. (2007). Vrtni Gradovi Ebenezera Hauarda. Sociologija Vol XLIX? (4): 313- 332.
Pajvančić, C. A. (2015). Koncept globalnog grada kao pristup razumevanju savrmenih obrazaca urbanizacije i globalizacije. Novi Sad: Filozofski Fakultet.
Pušić, Lj. (2001). Održivi grad: ka jednoj sociologiji okruženja, Beograd: Slobodan Mašić.
Pušić, Lj. (1997). Grad, društvo, prostor-sociologija grada, Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Stokes, J. C. (1962). A Theory of Slums. Lan Economics 38 (3):187-197.
UN Habitat (2003). The challenge of slums-Global report on human settlements, Earthscan Publications Ltd.
UN Habitat (2014). “Housing & Slum Upgrading”. Urban Themes. 9 Nov. 2014, http://unhabitat.org/urbanthemes/housing-slum-upgrading/. Pristupljeno: 07.01.2017.
Ward, D. (1976).The Victorian Slum: An Enduring Myth. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 66 (2): 323-336.
