International Legal Aspects of Mass Surveillance and Implications on Privacy




law, cyber security, privacy, mass surveillance


The development of modern information and communication technologies, in addition to numerous positive aspects, has also brought challenges to human rights, especially the right to privacy. The paper analyzes the relationship between the practice of mass surveillance and the right to privacy. The acute problem of abuse during the practice of mass surveillance at the international level was pointed out. An analysis of the existing legal framework at the international level was performed, as well as the practice of European institutions. Research has shown that international law does not support modern policies and practices of mass surveillance, which are especially used by the great powers. It has been established that states, especially great powers, resort to the argument that national security is endangered or that there is a danger of terrorism, to justify the practice of mass surveillance. Given the lack of universal legal regulations that would protect the right to privacy from abuse based on the practice of mass surveillance, the solution lies in concluding bilateral agreements or adopting non-binding legal norms. The normative method and legal-logical methods of induction and deduction were used in the research.


Download data is not yet available.


Barnes, S. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, XI(9).

Boban, M. (2012). The right to privacy and the right to access information in the modern information society. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, XLIX(3), 581–582.

Cho, H., Rivera-Sanchez, R., & Sun Sun, L. (2009). A Multinational Study on Online Privacy: Global Concern and Local Responses. New Media & Society, XI(3), 395–416.

Dimitrijević, P. (2014.). Pravo informacione tehnologije [Information Technology Law]. Uni-verzitet u Nišu: Pravni fakultet.

Emmerson, B. (2017). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism : note / by the Sec-retariat. (A/HRC/34/61). United Nations Digital Library.

European Court of Human Rights [ECtHR]. (2022, January). Mass surveillance [Press Unit]. ECHR, Factsheet.

FRA – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2015). Surveillance by intelligence services: fundamental rights safeguards and remedies in the EU – Mapping Member States' legal frameworks.

Jarvis-Thomson, J. (1975). The Right to Privacy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, IV(4), 295-314.

Jovanović, S. (2014). Privatnost i zaštita podataka na internetu [Privacy and Data Protection on the Internet]. In V. Urošević (Ed.), Veze cyber kriminala sa iregularnom migracijom i trgovinom ljudima. (pp. 87–164).

Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije. King, J., Lampinen, A., & Smolen, A. (2011). Privacy: Is There An App for That? In L. F. Cranor (Ed.), Symposium on Usable Pri-vacy and Security. (pp. 1– 20). SOUPS ’11, Pittsburgh, PA, USA – July 20 – 22, 2011. ACM.

Klass and Others v. Germany (dec.) No. 5029/71, § 51, ECHR 214.

Kurland, P. (1976). The Private. University of Chicago Magazine, 69(1), 8.

Leetaru, K. (2019, June 18). Much Of Our Government Digital Surveillance Is Outsourced To Private Companies. Forbes. kalevleetaru/2019/06/18/much-of-our-government-digital-surveillance-is-outsourced-to-private-companies/?sh=61cacec31799

MacKinnon, C. (1989). Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Harvard University Press.

Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2014). The right to privacy in the digital age. United Nations.

Privacy International. (2018). Privacy International’s response to call for input to a report on the right to privacy in the digital age by the UN High Commissioner for human rights. OHCR.

Posner, R. (1982). The Economic of Justice. Michigan Law Review, LXXX(4), 942-946.

Privacy International. (2020). Mass Surveillance.

Sarat, O. (2015). A World without Privacy (What Law can and should Do?). Cambridge Uni-versity Press.

Shah, M. (2013). Online Social Networks: Privacy Threats. In R. Chbeir, & B. Al Bouna (Eds.), Security and privacy preserving in social networks. (pp. 73-94). Springer.

Sinđelić, Ž. (2012). Pravo na privatnost-krivičnopravni, krivičnoprocesni i kriminalistički aspekti [Right to Privacy-Criminal, criminal, Procedural and Criminalistic Aspects]. (Doc-toral dissertation).

Surveillance (2017). In M. Bošković, Leksikon bezbednosti [Security Lexicon]. Službeni glas-nik.

UNCTAD. (2020). Data Protection and Privacy Legislation Worldwide.

United Nations General Assembly. (2015, February 10). The right to privacy in the digital age: resolution. (A/RES/75/176). United Nations Digital Library.

Human Rights Committee. (2019, May 30). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promo-tion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression. (A/HRC/41/35/Add.2) (Excerpts). United Nations.

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2021). Promotion and protection of the human rights and fundamental freedoms of Africans and of people of African de-scent against excessive use of force and other human rights violations by law enforcement officers. (A/HRC/47/53). United Nations Digital Library.

Venice Commission. (2015). Update of the 2007 Report on the Democratic Oversight of the Security Services and the Report on the Democratic Oversight of Signals Intelligence Agencies. Council of Europe.

Vilić, V. (2016). Povreda prava na privatnost zloupotrebom društvenih mreža [Violation of Right to Privacy on Social Networks as a Form of Cyber Criminality][Doctoral dissertation, University of Niš: Faculty of Law).

Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220.

Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.) No. 54934/00, § 4, ECHR 2006-III.




How to Cite

S. Domazet , S., & S. Dinić, S. (2022). International Legal Aspects of Mass Surveillance and Implications on Privacy. KULTURA POLISA, 19(1), 79–97.