Improving the United Nations General Assembly’s Working Methods as a Possibility of Ending Its Marginalization

Authors

  • Jelica Gordanić Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2021.18.2r.1.04

Keywords:

the General Assembly, the United Nations, ad hoc working group (the AHWG), revitalization, agenda, the UN Charter, revision

Abstract

The paper analyses improving the United Nations General Assembly’s working methods as one of the possibilities of ending its marginalization. The General Assembly is facing numerous difficulties, including an overburdened agenda, repetitive agenda items, the need for better working organization and non-implementation of resolutions by the member states. Among the UN member states there is consent to improve the General Assembly’s working methods, but also disagreements on mechanisms it can be achieved. In order to strengthen the role and competencies of the General Assembly, an ad hoc working group on the revitalization of the work of the General Assembly (the AHWG) was established in 1991. So far, the AHWG group had made some contributions in improving the General Assembly’s working methods. The paper aims to show that efforts of the AHWG, although significant, are not sufficient to solve all problems of working methods of the General Assembly. The author concludes that the only effective way in solving the working methods of the General Assembly is the UN Charter revision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bailey, Sydney D. 1960. The General Assembly of the United Nations. A study of Procedure and Practice. London: Stevens & Sons Limited.

Cassel, Douglas. 2005. “Introduction and Postscript: Partial Progress on UN Reform” Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights IV (1): 1–5.

Global Policy Forum. 2003. “General Assembly Reform: Mission of the Netherlands to the United Nations.” 26 October 2003. https://archive.globalpolicy.org/reform/topics/ga/2003/1026nethreport.htm последњи проступ 02.04.2021.

Горданић, Јелица. 2020. „Јачање улоге Генералне скупштине Уједињених нација у процесу избора генералног секретара – између потребе и могућности“ Зборник радова Правног факултета у Новом Саду LIV (2): 781–801.

Maresca, Alex. 2014. “Report on the Second Thematic Meeting of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly” Center for UN Reform Education. https://centerforunreform.org/2014/07/24/report-on-the-second-thematic-meeting-of-the-ad-hoc-working-group-on-the-revitalization-of-the-work-of-the-general-assembly/ последњи приступ 06.04.2021.

Panke, Diana. 2014. “The UNGA- a talking shop? Exploring rationales for the repetition of resolutions in subsequent negotiations” Cambridge Review of International Affairs XXVII (3): 442–458.

Peterson, M. J. 2005. The UN General Assembly. London: Routledge.

Rosenthal, Gert. 2007. “Economic and Social Council.” In: Oxford Handbook on the United Nations, eds. Thomas G. Weiss, Sam Daws, 136 148. New York: Oxford University Press.

Smouts, Marie Claude. 2000. “The General Assembly: Grandeur and Decadence.” In: The United Nations at the Millennium- Principal organs, eds. Paul Taylor, A.J.R. Groom, 21 60. London and New York: Continuum.

South Centre. 1997. For a Strong and Democratic United Nations. A South Perspective on UN Reform. London & New York in association with South Centre Geneva: Zed Books Ltd.

Swart, Lydia. 2008. “Revitalization of the work of the General Assembly.” In: Managing Change at the United Nations, ed. E. Perry, 21 36. New York:

Center for UN Reform Education.

United Nations. Revitalization of the work of the General Assembly. https://www.un.org/en/ga/revitalization последњи приступ 05. 04. 2021.

United Nations General Assembly [UNGA], A/RES/58/126 (2004), Resolution adopted by the General Assembly at its 58th session, on 13. January 2004.

United Nations General Assembly [UNGA], A/RES/58/316 (2004), Resolution adopted by the General Assembly at its 58th session, on 13. July 2004.

United Nations General Assembly [UNGA], A/64/903 (2010), Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly adopted by the General Assembly at its 64th session, on 08. September 2010.

United Nations General Assembly [UNGA], A/RES/69/321 (2015), Resolution adopted by the General Assembly at its 69th session, on 11 September 2015.

United Nations General Assembly [UNGA], A/RES/69/1007 (2015), Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly adopted by the General Assembly at its 69th session, on 03. September 2015.

United Nations General Assembly [UNGA], A/70/1003 (2016), Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly adopted by the General Assembly at its 70th session, on 02. August 2016.

United Nations General Assembly [UNGA], A/RES/72/313 (2018), Resolution adopted by the General Assembly at its 72nd session, on 17. September 2018.

United Nations General Assembly [UNGA], A/73/956 (2019), Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly adopted by the General Assembly at its 73th session, on 12. September 2019.

Hansen, Mie. 2012. “Report on the 2nd and 3rd Thematic Meeting in the Ad Hoc Working Group on Revitalization of the work of the General Assembly”, Center for UN Reform Education. http://www.centerforunreform.org/node/482 последњи приступ 03.04.2021.

Childers, Erskine, and Brian Urquhart. 1994. Renewing the United Nations System. Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation.

Џелетовић, Миленко, и Хатиџа Бериша. 2018. „Носиоци моћи у међународним односима као актери војног инeтрвенционизма“ Култура полиса XV (35): 145–164.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-03

How to Cite

Gordanić, J. (2021). Improving the United Nations General Assembly’s Working Methods as a Possibility of Ending Its Marginalization . KULTURA POLISA, 18(45), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2021.18.2r.1.04

Metrics