IS THE SOFT POWER OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY IN THE MIDDLE EAST ENOUGH?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2024.21.1r.202smtKeywords:
soft power, international relations, Republic of Turkey, Middle EastAbstract
Regardless of the existing conflicts, the twenty-first century might be predominantly a century of soft power, most pronounced in Europe. Turkey, which geographically belongs to Europe and Asia, has been looking to achieve its foreign policy priorities and is changing its methodology of conducting foreign policy. The use of soft power based on national culture, political values, religion, economy, institutions, and international relations in the early 21st century represented a radical turn compared to earlier historical attempts. Throughout history, Turkey used hard power in the region, but it was mostly unsuccessful. Therefore, the nature of soft power represented an opportunity for strengthening Turkey as a regional power and a qualitative change of negative stereotypes about this country. However, it is evident that soft power in the changed regional security circumstances in the final years of the second decade in the 21st century is insufficient, so Turkey has started using hard power (military) again to strengthen its leadership position. This paper explains the soft power of the Republic of Turkey in the MENA region and the recent reorientation to the combination of military strength and diplomatic influence in international relations. How much that rearrangement in foreign policy will position Turkey in the new security and political circumstances at the beginning of the 21st century's third decade remains to be seen.
Downloads
References
th Council Meeting General Affairs and External Relations, General Affairs. European Commission. (2005, October,3), https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/PRES_05_241
Agreement Establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey and the Additional Protocol. Council of the European Communities. Official Journal of the European Communities. Vol. 16, No. C113, (1973, December 24), http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/turkey/association_agreement_1964_en.pdf>.
Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey. Council of the European Communities. Official Journal of the European Communities, No L 361 /29, (1977, December 31), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:f8e2f9f4-75c8-4f62-ae3fb86ca5842eee.0008.02/DOC_2&format=PDF
Ahiska, M. (2003). Occidentalism: The Historical Fantasy of the Modern. South Atlantic Quarterly, 102 (2–3): 351–379. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-102-2-3-351
Arab Barometer, (2023, November 5), About Arab Barometer. https://www.arabbarometer.org/about/
Baker, R. (2020, November 27), Middle Powers: Maneuvering Among Giants. RANE. https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/middlepowers-maneuvering-among-giants
BP Azerbaijan, (2023, November 10), Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. https://www.bp.com/en_az/azerbaijan/home/who-weare/operationsprojects/pipelines/btc.html
Ceyhun, H. E. (2018). Turkey in the Middle East: Findings from the Arab Barometer. Boğaziçi University, Working Paper
Coşkun, B. B. (2016). The Post- Davutoğlu Era in Turkish Foreign Policy, E-International Relations, http://www.e-ir.info/2016/06/03/the-postDavutoğlu-era-inturkish-foreign-policy/
Danforth, N. (2008). Ideology and Pragmatism in Turkish Foreign Policy: From Atatürk To The AKP. Project on Middle East Democracy, Washington, DC.
Davutoğlu, A. (2001). Stratejik Derinlik [Strategic Depth]. Küre Yayınları.
Davutoglu, A. (2008). Turkey’s Foreign Policy Vision: An Assessment of 2007. Insight Turkey 10, no. 1, https://www.insight turkey.com/articles/turkeys-foreign-policy-vision-anassessment-of-2007
Davutoğlu, A. (2012). Principles of Turkish Foreign Policy and Regional Political Structuring, International Policy and Leadership Institute, Third edition, https://www.tepav.org.tr/en/haberler/s/2827
Davutoğlu, A. (2014). Teoriden Pratiğe Türk Dış Politikası Üzerine Konuşmalar [Conversations on Turkish Foreign Policy from Theory to Practice]. Küre Yayınları.
Erşen, E. (2014). Geopolitical Codes in Davutoğlu’s Views toward the Middle East, Insight Turkey Vol. 16 / No. 1
EU Enlargement Policy. European Council, Council of the European Union, (2023, December 18), https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/ turkey/
Glossary Term: European Economic Community. European Commission, (2023, November 29), https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-tomarkets/en/glossary/european-economic-community
Haynes, J. (2007). Religion and Development: Conflict or Cooperation?. Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057 /9780230589568
Haynes. J. (2012). Religious Transnational Actors and Soft Power (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315605142
Ilić, N. & Stojkovic, R. (2017). The Development of The European Union, Serbian Journal of Engineering Management Vol. 2, No. 2.
Kibaroglu, M., (2012). What Went Wrong with the Zero Problem with Neighbors Doctrine?.Turkish Policy Quarterly 11, no. 3
Milosavljević B. (2021). Turska spoljna politika i energetska savezništva, Bezbednosni forum, br.1, Evroazijski bezbednosni forum, Beograd, 2021, str. 93–113.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey, (2010, May 20), Article by H.E. Ahmet Davutoğlu published in Foreign Policy magazine (USA) on 20 May 2010. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/ article-by-h_e_-ahmet-davutoglu-published-in-foreign-policymagazine-_usa_-on-20-may-2010.en.mfa
Nye S. J. Jr. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs.
Nye, S. J. Jr. (2012). China's Soft Power Deficit To catch up, its politics must unleash the many talents of its civil society, The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304451104577389923098678842
Steiner, K. (2011). Religion and Politics in Singapore – Matters of National Identity and Security?. A Case Study of the Muslim Minority in a Secular State. Osaka University Law Review, 107- 134. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2342391
Štrbac, K. & Milosavljević, B. (2019). Rusko-tursko energetsko savezništvo i položaj Republike Srbije, [The Russian-Turkish energy alliance and the position of the Republic of Serbia].
Zbornik Energetska diplomatija Republike Srbije u savremenim međunarodnim odnosima, Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu.
Thomas, M. S. (2005). The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations: The Struggle for the Soul of the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tomić, D. (2017). Phases of the security risk in the decision-making process in the Republic of Bulgaria. Serbian Journal of Engineering Management. Vol. 2. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.5937/SJEM1702042T
Tüysüzog˘lu, G., (2014). Strategic Depth: A Neo-Ottomanist Interpretation of Turkish Eurasianism.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Katarina Štrbac, Branislav Milosavljević, Vladimir Tomašević
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.