COUPLING CULTURE AND SPACE FOR THE POSTGROWTH

Vanja Vujanović; Milica Kočović De Santo

doi:10.51738/Kpolisa2023.20.2r.175vkds

Authors

Vanja Vujanović Faculty of Dramatic Arts, Belgrade, Serbia, PhD student https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3858-5771
Milica Kočović De Santo Insittute of economic sciences, Belgrade, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3304-7801

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2023.20.2r.175vkds

Keywords:

cultural policy, spatial and urban policy, degrowth, integrative strategies for culture and space

Abstract

This study explores why there is a fundamental need to integrate cultural, urban, and spatial planning. We also argue for a stronger linkage of degrowth with cultural and spatial studies to achieve urgent developmental transformations. In this study, we aim to highlight three of the most important considerations as possible steps towards various future systemic solutions, considering the historical background on development, ideology, power, culture, city, economy and other relevant policies. 1) The importance of participatory strategies and inclusive approaches in promoting various cultural and urban policies (based on practices as shown in cases) as essential for the future; 2) Embedding degrowth discussions in the fields of space and culture aims to highlight multiple alternative paths that can be taken to address systemic issues; 3) Theories of cultural and urban participation crossed with practise provide a strategic framework to explore possibilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Vanja Vujanović, Faculty of Dramatic Arts, Belgrade, Serbia, PhD student

student doktorskih studija Fakulteta dramskih umetnosti

Milica Kočović De Santo, Insittute of economic sciences, Belgrade, Serbia

References

Anguelovski, I., & Alier, J. M. (2014). The ‘Environmentalism of the Poor’revisited: Territory and place in disconnected glocal struggles Ecological Economics, 102, 167–176.

Bishop, P., Williams, L. (2012). The temporary city. Routledge.

Colomb, C. (2012). Pushing the urban frontier: Temporary uses of space, city marketing, and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 131–152.

Čukić, I. (2016). Uloga privremenih urbanih praksi u aktiviranju prostornih resursa [The role of temporary urban practices in activation of spatial resources]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univerzitet u Beogradu: Arhitektonski fakultet].

D’Alisa, G., Demaria, F., & Kallis, G. (2014). Degrowth: a vocabulary for a new era. Routledge.

Douglas, G. C. C. (2014). Do–It–Yourself Urban Design: The Social Practice of Informal “Improvement” Through Unauthorized Alteration. City & Community, 13(1), 5–25.https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12029

Dragićević-Šešić, M., Mihaljinac, N. (2016). From City Identity to City Branding: Artivistic Initiatives or Top-down Urban Regeneration? In T. Domański (Eds). The Role of Cultural Institutions and Eventsin the Marketing of Cities and Regions (pp. 93-103). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.

Escobar, A., (2008). Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes. Duke University Press.

Ferreri, M. (2015). The seduction of temporary urbanism. Ephemera Journal: Theory and Politics in Organization, 15(1), 181–191.

Gačić, J. M., & Mićović, M. (2020). Novi pristupi u planiranju otpornih gradova [New approaches for planning the resilient cities]. Kultura polisa, 17(41), 417–433.

Hickel, J. (2019). Degrowth: a theory of radical abundance. RealWorld Economics Review, 87(19), 54-68.

Hickel, J. (2021). What does degrowth mean? A few points of clarification. Globalizations, 18(7), 1105-1111.

Iveson, K. (2013). Cities within the City: Do-It-Yourself urbanism and the right to the City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 941–956.

Jocić, N. (2021). Različita lica postosocijalističkog urabnog razvoja: iskustva iz Beograda [Different faces of post-socialist urban development: experiences from Belgrade]. Sophos, 14, Znanstveno-istraživački inkubator (ZINK) Filozofski fakultet u Sarajevu.

Kisić, V.,Tomka, G. (2021). Milena Dragićević Šešić: Imagining postcapitalist cultural policy futures. Cultural Trends, 31(3), 273– 286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2021.2017233

Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaria, F., & Acosta, A. (Eds.). (2019). Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary. Tullika Books.

Kočović De Santo, M. (2022). Eco+Cultural=Degrowth tourism: Interdisciplinary perspectives from ecological economics, cultural economics, decolonization, commons studies and theory of degrowth. Faculty of media and communication and Faculty of Organizational studies in Belgrade.

Kočović De Santo, M., Milovanović-Rodić D., Babović D. & Kuzma, I. (2022a). Empowering strategic priority areas of cultural policy: Empirical findings on cultural participation processes in Serbia. Strategic Management.https://doi.org/10.5937/StraMan2200030K

Kočović De Santo, M. (2023). The Progressivity and transformative role of culture. In M. Kočović De Santo & S. E. Domptail (Eds.), Degrowth Decolonization and Development (pp. 17–55). Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25945-6_2

Kočović De Santo, M., Domptail, S.E., Hirsch, J. (2023a). How culture and worldviews shape development and our environment. In M. Kočović De Santo, & S.E. Domptail (Eds.), Degrowth Decolonization and Development (pp. 1–16). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031- 25945-6_1

Latouche, S. (2010). Degrowth. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 519-522.

Latouche, S. (2014). Essays on Frugal Abundance. Degrowth: Misinterpretations and Controversies, Part 1. The Simplicity Institute.

Lyndon, M. (2012). Tactical Urbanism, Volume 1.http://issuu.com/streetplanscollaborative/docs/tactical_urbani sm_vol.1

Magdziak, M. (2019). Social Participation and Experimental Spatial Interventions as Effective Methods of Activating Problematic Urban Areas. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 471(7).https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/7/072010

Milosavljević, V. (2015). Magacin u Kraljevića Marka. Manek, 4, 28- 33.

Nedučin, D., Krklješ, M. (2022). Culture-Led Regeneration of Industrial Brownfield Hosting Temporary Uses: A Post-Socialist Context–Case Study from Novi Sad, Serbia. Sustainability, 14(23), Article 16150.https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316150

Oswalt, P., Overmeyer, K., & Misselwitz, P. (2013). Urban Catalyst: The power of temporary use. Dom Publishers.

Petrović-Balubdžić M. (2017). Creating the Belgrade Waterfront Identity through a Prism of Architecture and Urban Planning Competitions. Spatium, 37, 74–81.

Rava, P. (2017). Urbana moć upravljanja urbanim razvojem(?) [Urban power controls the urban development(?)]. Kultura polisa, 14(33), 307–320.

Stojkov, B. (2008). Oživljavanje braunfilda [Brownfield revival]. In K. Danilović, B. Stojkov, S. Zeković, Ž. Gligorijević, & D. Damjanović (Eds.), Oživljavanje braunfilda u Srbiji: Priručnik za donosioceodluka i profesionalce (pp. 53–60). PALGO centar.

Stojanović, M. (2018, July 17). Savski Amfiteatar: Od društveno odgovornog socijalizma do surovog kapitalizma [Sava Amphitheatre: From socially responsible socialism to cruel capitalism]. Gradnja. https://www.gradnja.rs/savski-amfiteatar-od-drustvenoodgovornog-socijalizma-do-surovog-kapitalizma/

Vaništa Lazarević, E. (2010). Urbana obnova, regeneracija i brownfield [Urban renewal, regeneration and brownfield]. In M. Bajić Brković (Eds.), Kreativne strategije za održvi razvoj gradova u Srbiji (pp. 51–69). Arhitektonski fakultet u Beogradu.

Vidović, D. (2014). New Models of Cultural Centers – Case of Croatia. The 8th International Conference on Cultural Policy Research – Iccpr 2014. UNESCO.

Višnić, E. (2008). Kulturne politike odozdo: Nezavisna kultura i nove suradničke prakse u Hrvatskoj [Cultural policies from below: Independent culture and new collaborative practices in Croatia]. Clubture.

Vuksanović-Macura, Z. (2015). Bara Venecija i Savamala – železnica i grad [Bara Venecija and Savamala – railway and city]. Nasleđe, 16, 9–26.