Vršnjačko nasilje kao oblik socijalne destrukcije

Željko Ninčić

doi:10.51738/Kpolisa2022.19.2p.201n

Authors

Željko Ninčić Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd Direkcija policije Uprava policije https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6540-794X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2022.19.2p.201n

Keywords:

violence, destruction, peer violence, social reaction

Abstract

Every act of violence carries a certain destructive "potential" which effect depends, both on the form of its manifestation as well as on the "sensitivity of the target" to which it is directed. Such acts represent various forms of social destruction where, surely, peer violence has a special place. This "uniqueness" is reflected in the sensitivity of the population that is a participant in this form of violence. It is, most often, the school population, young people who are in the most important period of their physical, emotional, intellectual, and cultural development. Therefore, peer violence can have a decisive impact on their overall development, regardless of whether they participate as perpetrators or are victims of such violence. The aim of this paper is to point out the problem of peer violence, the difficulty of identifying various forms as well as the seriousness of the consequences that peer violence can have on both the victim and the perpetrator. By analyzing various contents, which subject is research on peer violence, using the methods of induction and deduction, the author seeks to identify those elements of peer violence that, with an adequate social reaction, would have a decisive influence on reducing its destructive character. The paper emphasizes the necessity of terminological delimitation of certain terms that are used as synonyms for defining violence. It points out the phenomenon of peer violence, its types and the risk factors that determine it. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of society in preventing peer violence, and the necessity for various mechanisms to recognize it and prevent its negative effects. It is especially pointed out that the determination of the society to face peer violence is a fundamental prerequisite for its suppression.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bilić, V., & Karlović, A. (2004). Nasilje među djecom. Poliklinika za zaštitu djece grada Zagreba.

Bjelajac, Ž., & Matijašević, J. (2013). Nasilјe kao oblik socio-patološkog ponašanja. Kultura polisa, 10(22), 409–425. https://kpolisa.com/index.php/kp/article/view/1278/1224

Bjelajac, Ž., & Merdović, B. (2019). Nasilјe nad decom u porodici. Kultura polisa, 16(39), 191–202. https://kpolisa.com/index.php/kp/article/view/343

Bjelajac, Ž., & Filipović, A. M. (2021). Specific Characteristics of Digital Violence and Digital Crime [Specifičnosti digitalnog nasilja i digitalnog kriminala]. Pravo – teorija i praksa, 38(4), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2104016B

Borduin, M. C. &Ronis. T. S. (2012). Individual, family, peer, and academic characteristics of female serious juvenile offenders [Individualne, porodične, vršnjačke i akademske karakteristike teških maloletnih prestupnica]. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 10(4), 386–400.

Cannavicci, M. (1999). Piccolo dizionario di criminologia [Mali rečnik kriminologije]. EDUP. Roma.

Coloroso, B. (2004). Nasilnik, žrtva i promatrač; od vrtića do srednje škole; kako roditelji i učitelji mogu pomoći u prekidanju kruga nasilja. Bios.

Vujaklija, M. (1980). Leksikon stranih reči i izraza. Prosveta.

Đurić, S. (2007). Bezbednosni rizici u školama ‒ modeli otkrivanja i reagovanja. Fakultet bezbednosti. Beograd.

Fineran, S., Bennett, L. & Sacco, T. (2003). Peer sexual harassment and peer violence among adolescents in Johannesburg and Chicago [Vršnjačko seksualno uznemiravanje i vršnjačko nasilje među adolescentima u Johanesburgu i Čikagu]. International Social Work, 46(3), 387–402.

Finley, L. L. (2007). Encyclopedia of Juvenile Violence [Enciklopedija maloletničkog nasilja]. Greenwood press.

Harper, R. C., Leandra. N. P., Christopher C. H., Varjas, K., & Meyers, J. (2012). Peer victimization and school safety: the role of coping effectiveness [Vršnjačka viktimizacija i bezbednost škole: uloga efektivnosti suočavanja]. Journal of School Violence, 11(4), 267–287.

Herrenkohl, T. I., & Jung, H. (2016). Effects of child abuse, adolescent violence, peer approval and pro-violence attitudes on intimate partner violence in adulthood [Efekti zlostavljanja dece, nasilja adolescenata, vršnjačkog odobravanja i stavova u korist nasilja intimnog partnera u odraslom dobu]. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 26(4), 304–314.

Išpanović, V., Stevanović, I. i Lajović, B. (2016). O vršnjačkom nasilju iz različitih uglova. Centar za prava deteta.

Kekić, D., Radovanović, I., & Tomić, M. (2014). Faktori rizika nasilja među vršnjacima u školama Srbije. U D. Kolarić (Ur.), Nasilje u Srbiji ‒ uzroci, oblici, posledice i društvene reakcije (176–187). Kriminalističko-policijska akademija u Beogradu.

Marković, D. M., & Zirojević, M. T. (2021). Ćutanje između ljubavi i straha – Zašto žrtve nasilja ćute. U Z. Kuburić, A. Zotova i Lj. Ćumura (Pr.),

Ljubav i strah u interdisciplinarnim istraživanjima: zbornik radova sa naučnog skupa, Beograd 9–10. maj 2021. (pp. 311–329). CEIR, Porodični razgovori.

McGloin, J. (2009). Delinquency balance: revisiting peer influence [Ravnoteža delikvencije: preispitivanje uticaja vršnjaka]. Criminology, 47(2), 439–478.

Milošević, L., & Marković Krstić, S. (2009). Problem nasilja u školama u nekim zemljama Balkana. U Lj. Milosavljević, N. Jovanović i D. Zaharijevski (Ur.). Protivurečnosti socijalizacije mladih i uloga obrazovanja u afirmaciji vrednosti kulture mira. (359–373). Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu.

Ninčić, Ž. (2014). Nasilje kao „obrazac“ ponašanja u Srbiji. U D. Kolarić (Ur.), Nasilje u Srbiji ‒ uzroci, oblici, posledice i društvene reakcije (203–213). Kriminalističko-policijska akademija u Beogradu.

Olweus, D. (1996). Nasilništvo u školi. Educa.

O'Regan, J., F. (2008). Kako se nositi s djecom problematična ponašanja: ne mogu učiti, ne žele učiti, ne zanima ih. Naklada Ljevak.

Popadić, D. (2009). Nasilje u školama. Institut za psihologiju.

Popadić, D., & Plut, D. (2007). Nasilje u osnovnim školama u Srbiji ‒ oblici i učestalost, Psihologija, 40(2), 309–328.

Srna, J. (2003). Nasilje. Žarko Albulj.

Staff, J., & Kreager A. D. (2008). Too cool for school: violence, peer status and high school dropout [Previše kul za školu: nasilje, status vršnjaka i napuštanje srednje škole]. Social Forces, 87(1), 445–472.

Steinberg, L. (2000). Youth violence: Do parents and families make a difference? [Nasilje mladih: Da li roditelji i porodice prave razliku?]. National Institute of Justice Journal, 2, 30–38.

Stelios. N. G. (2009). Personal and maternal parameters of peer violence at school [Lični i materinski parametri vršnjačkog nasilja u školi]. Journal of School Violence, 8(2), 100–119.

Strabic, N. & Tokic Milakovic, A. (2016). Cyberbullying among children and its comparison to traditional forms of peer violence [Sajber maltretiranje među decom i njegovo poređenje sa tradicionalnim oblicima vršnjačkog nasilja]. Kriminologija Socijalna Integracija, 24(2),184–201.

Toledano, S., Werch, B. L., & Wiens, A. B. (2015). Domain-specific self-concept in relation to traditional and cyber peer aggression [Samokoncept specifičan za domen u odnosu na tradicionalnu i sajber vršnjačku agresiju]. Journal of School Violence, 14(4), 405–424.

Vogel, M., & Keith, S. (2015). Vicarious peer victimization and adolescent violence: unpacking the effects of social learning, general strain, and peer group selection [Vikarna vršnjačka viktimizacija i adolescentsko nasilje: raspakivanje efekata društvenog učenja, opšteg naprezanja i selekcije vršnjačke grupe]. Deviant Behavior, 36(10), 834–852.

World report on violence and health [Svetski izveštaj o nasilju i zdravlju]. (2002). Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO).

Zečević, I. (2010). Priručnik ‒ Program prevencije vršnjačkog nasilja u školama. UNICEF.