COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SECURITY ASSESSMENT

Authors

  • Slaviša Đukanović Министарство унутрашњих послова РС Управа за аналитику
  • Branislav Milosavljević Министарство одбране РС Институт за стратегијска истраживања

Keywords:

security assessments, intelligence estimates, counterintelligence estimates

Abstract

Although there are various methodologies of security assessment, their common feature is foundation on the basis of data collected on the object of assessment. Quality of a security assessment depends (among other factors) of the quantity and quality of the collected information. The lack of a unified and generally accepted safety assessment methodology does not mean that the various security assessments have common denominators. The essential difference lies in theoretic approach or the security concept, which depends on the subject of security. However, despite the different methodologies and structures making security assessments, we can identify common elements for various security assessments.

Its main value is in minimizing the uncertainty. Namely, if the assessment of uncertainty in achieving the targets shows that the uncertainty has been reduced to a minimum, on the same level it would represent a safe element of determining important factors to select the variations of the decision.

The value of the prediction lies in possibility to perceive the necessity and possibility and probability of events that might be expected in the future, on the basis of the results entrenched by the analysis. However, in the prediction, one should not be exclusive. It is advisable to provide more varieties of manifestation of destructive activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allied Joint Intelligence, Counter Intelligence and Security – Intelligence Procedures, NATO restricted publication, 1992.

AJP, Allied Joint Intelligence, Counter Intelligence and Security Doctrine, NATO Standardization Agency, Brussels, July 2003.

Dragišić, Z.: Bezbednosni menadžment, Službeni list, Beograd 2007. godina.

Godson, R.: Intelligence Reguirements for the 1980 (Number Two) Analysis and Estimates, Washington, National Strategy Information Center, 1980.

Ђорђевић, О.: Лексикон безбедности, Партизанска књига, Боград 1986.

Intelligence Procedures – AJP 2.1., NATO Standardization Agency, Brussels, March 2002.

Joint Pub 3-07.2 Joint Tacties, Technigues and Procedures for Antiterrorism, 17. March 1998.

Мијалковски, М.: Тероризам и противтерористичка дејства, ВИЗ, Београд, 2003.

Мијалковски, М.: Обавештајне и безбедносне службе, ЈП Службени гласник, Београд, 2009.

Милошевић, М.: Систем државне безбедности, Полицијска академија, Београд 2001.

Marković, V.: Teorija bezbednosti sa metodologijom istraživanja bezbednosnih pojava, Jugoart, Zagreb,1988.

Marrin, S.: Homeland Security and the Analysis of Foreigh Intelligence, Markle Foundation Task Force on National Security in the Information, 2002.

SEECAP – South East Europe Common Assessment Paper.

Sherman, К.: Estimate and Influence, www.cia.gov

Стајић, Љ.: Основи безбедности са основама истраживања безбедносних појава, ФЦО, Београд, 2005.

Стевановић, О.: Руковођење и командовање, Полицијска академија, Београд, 1999.

Heuer, J. R. Jr.: Psihology of Intelligence Analysis, Center for the Study of Intelligence Central Intelligence Agency, www.cia.gov/csi/books/19104/.

Downloads

Published

2012-10-31

How to Cite

Đukanović , S. . ., & Milosavljević, B. . (2012). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SECURITY ASSESSMENT. KULTURA POLISA, 9(2), 513–525. Retrieved from https://kpolisa.com/index.php/kp/article/view/1399

Metrics