URBANIZATION AND CRIME
Keywords:
Urbanization, Crime, Demographic Trends of Population, Organized Crime, Unorganized Crime, Poverty, Violence, PreventionAbstract
From the economic point of view, urbanization represents a useful social process that supports the country's economic development through the growth of industrial production, service sector development and enlargement of agricultural production. From the social point of view, urbanization accelerates the expansion of crime in major cities and urban areas because of better opportunities hiding perpetrators of crimes and easier organizing of criminal organizations. Urbanization, unemployment, inflation, unequal status and rights of individuals in society, and low levels of education are the main socio-economic determinants that affect the level of development of crime in society. In the world there are five states with more than ten cities with more than million citizens: China - 89, India - 46, USA - 42, Brazil – 21 and Mexico - 12 cities. Also, today there are 21 giant cities with over 10 million residents. Dhaka in Bangladesh and Kinshasa in the Democratic Republic of Congo today have a 40 times larger area than 60 years ago. The major problem of such cities is suburban, slums, unorganized built neighborhoods, so called slums, or favelas. The population in these areas faces a number of social problems: unemployment, low level of literacy, crime, drug abuse and unsanitary living conditions. Three main manifestations of criminal activities in large urban areas are white collar crime, organized and unorganized crime. White collar crime in urban centers include fraud, criminal acts in the area of cyber crime and money laundering, which carried out the abuse of legal professions in the public administration and large companies which are concentrated in the same. The rapid process of urbanization leads to the expansion of organized crime groups in large cities involved in organized prostitution, racketeering, trafficking in persons, as well as trading and distribution of narcotics and weapons. Disorganized criminal is inherent in unregulated urban suburbs of cities where there is a lack of organized policing in the case of urban areas that have shaken the political and religious conflict. Also, there are crimes that perform individuals or groups composed temporarily and for a particular opportunity. Expansion of criminal activity is particularly pronounced in the multi-million cities in middleincome and undeveloped countries with high population growth, where population growth is not accompanied by employment, education and socialization resident population. Preventing crime is a synchronized and from all social factors supported the process, which in urban areas is managed through three levels. The primary level of prevention aims to reduce any identified factors at the level of families, communities and institutions that contribute to the development of crime is carried out through educational and informational systems, cultural institutions, social security institutions, non-governmental sector, especially through youth organizations. The secondary level is implemented through specific programs in areas that are directed on phenomenon, groups and individuals which are at greater risk for the development of criminal activities. Tertiary level is focused on action in situations where crime is already occurring, and to prevent the return of a criminal organization and conduct of serious crimes.
Downloads
References
Becker, Gary S. (1968): Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 76, Iss. 2, pp. 169-217.
Bjelajac, Željko (2008): Organizovani kriminal vs Srbija. Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe, Novi Sad.
Vuković, Slaviša (2011): Savremeni pristupi i problemi u socijalnoj prevenciji kriminala, Bezbednost, Beograd, Vol. 53, Br. 3, str. 95-111.
Galvin, Ellen B. (2002): Crime and Violence in an Urbanizing World, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 56, No.1, pp. 123-145.
Gillani, Rehman and Gill, Abid (2009): Unemployment, Poverty, Inflation and Crime Nexis: Cointegration and Caisaity Analysis of Pakistan, Pakistan Economic and Social Review, Vol.47, No.1, pp. 79-98.
Glaeser, Edward L. & Sacerdote, Bruce (1999): Why is there More Crime in Cities?, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 107(S6), pp. S225-S258.
Gumus, Erdal (2004): Crime in urban areas: An empirical investigation, Akdeniz I.I. B.F, Dergisi, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 98-109.
Ehrlich, Isaac (1973): Participation in illegitimate activities: A theoretical and empirical investigation, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 307- 322.
Jovašević, Dragan (2006): Krivično pravo- opšti deo, Nomos, Beograd, Srbija.
Kovačević-Lepojević, Marina & Žunić-Pavlović, Vesna (2010): Kriminal belog okovratnika i mogućnosti prevencije, Socijalna misao, Vol. 17, Br. 4, str. 37-47.
Krivo, Lauren J. & Peterson, Ruth D. (1996): Extremely Disadvantaged Neighbourhoods and Urban Crime, Social Forces, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 619-650.
Offender Index Database (2012): The Police National Computer, 2001-2010.
Omotor, Douglason G. (2009): Socio-Economic determinants of crime in Nigeria, Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 54 – 59.
Fleisher, Belton M. (1966): The Effect of Income on Delinquency, The American Economic Review, Vol. 55, No. 1/2, pp. 118-137.
Hagan, John (1993): The Social Embeddedness of Crime and Unemployment, Criminology, Vol. 31, Iss. 4, pp. 465-491.
Heilig, Gerhard K. (2012): World Urbanization Prospects, the 2011 Revision, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) Population Division - Population Estimates and Projections Section, Washington, USA.
Coomer, Nicole (2003): America’s underclass and crime: The influence of macroeconomic Factors, Issues in Political Economy, Vol. 12, pp. 90-114.
(2012): Krivični Zakonik, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 85/2005, 88/2005 - ispr., 107/2005 - ispr., 72/2009, 111/2009 i 121/2012.
(2010): Strategija razvoja obrazovanja u Srbiji do 2020. godine, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 107/2012.