METHODOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL CHALLENGES IN CRISIS AND DISASTER RESEARCH

Authors

  • Želimir Kešetović Факултет безбедности Београд
  • Srđan Milašinović Криминалистичко-полицијска академија Београд

Keywords:

crisis, disaster, political context, methodology, research, safety

Abstract

Since ancient times, people have dealt with crises and disasters, and tried to avoid these events and mitigate and minimize their consequences. Over the time, the concept of crisis is developed, but the crisis management concept as a product of the XX century. The authors present the theoretical sources of crisis management and anlyse crisis as a theoretical problem and a challenge for research. Special attention is given to the observation of the crisis in the political context, giving the possible theoretical and methodological framework for the study of crises and disaster. Public management in crisis and disaster management is becoming increasingly important and essential task of contemporary society. By the fact that it represents a serious threat to the structure of political or safety systems, the management crisis involves the strategic knowledge, prediction and control of the uncertain situation at all levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babbie, E. (1995). The practice of social research (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Boin, A., ‘t Hart, P., Stern, E. i Sandelijus, B.(2010): Politika upravljanja krizama, Belgrade:Gazette/Faculty of Security Studies, Faculty of Security Studies, Belgrade, 2010, p. 92.

Gottschalk, J. (2002), Crisis management, Oxford Capstone Publishing.

Hood, C.: “The Risk Game and the Blame Game”, Government and Opposition, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2002, pp. 15–37.

Kešetović, Ž., (2008). Krizni menadžment, Belgrade: Faculty of Security Studies/Gazette.

Killitm, L.M. (1956). An Introduction to Methodological Problems of Field Studies in Disasters. Washington, D. C.: NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCESNATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL.

Malešič, M., Prezelj, I., Kopač, E. i Groselj, K. (2004) “Opomnika za preučevanje krizneg upravljanja i vodenja” u Malešič, M. (ur.) Krizno upravljanje in vodenje v Sloveniji izziv in priložnost, Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.

Milašinović, S., Kešetović, Ž., (2011) Krizni menadžment u istorijskoj perspektivi, Belgrade: The Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies.

Mitroff, I. (2000) Managing Crises before they happen, New York: AMACOM.

Poper, K. (1973). Logika naučnog otkrića. Belgrade: Nolit.

Robert, B., and Lajtha, C. (2002). “A New Approach to Crisis Mangement“, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol 10, No 4, 2002, pp. 181- 191.

Ritchie, B.W. “Chaos, crises and disasters: a strategic approach to crisis management in the tourism industry”, Tourism Management 25 (2004) 669–683.

Stallings, R.A., (2007). “Methodological Issues” in Rodríguez, H. Quarantelli, E.L., and Dynes, R.R. (eds) Handbook of Disaster Research, New York: Springer.

Seeger, M. W., Ulmer, R. R., Novak, J. M., Sellnowp, T.: (2005) “Post-crisis discourse and organizational change, failure and renewal”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 18 No. 1.

Downloads

Published

2013-06-30

How to Cite

Kešetović , Želimir ., & Milašinović, S. . (2013). METHODOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL CHALLENGES IN CRISIS AND DISASTER RESEARCH. KULTURA POLISA, 10(21), 229–248. Retrieved from https://kpolisa.com/index.php/kp/article/view/1251

Issue

Section

Monographic study

Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>