• Aleksandar Fatić Институт за филозофију и друштвену теорију Београд


private / public morality, Christian ethics, arrogance, lies in politics, national / public interest, public policy


The paper relates the requirements of public office and an active participation in the public life of a modern liberal democracy with the substantive moral requirements of Christian ethics, and addresses the dilemma of whether it is morally recommendable for a Christian to take public office, especially at a high level. The author argues that the moral pluralism which characterizes multicultural societies presents methodological reasons for caution with regard to political activism by a Christian. Namely, the values of a multicultural democracy are no entirely congruent with the values of the Christian faith, especially with regard to controversial social practices that relate to alternative life styles and the assumption of social and value equality between the choices that, while belonging to the realm of privacy, still violate the principles of Christian ethics. Thus the public official in a multicultural democracy must necessarily pursue policies and choices which militate against the substantive Christian moral values. While in some cases compromises are possible between the two, typically in high political office democratic life requires decisions to be made which would be entirely unacceptable from the point of view of Christian morality. The author argues that contrary to Thomas Nagel and others, that there is no morally justified discrepancy between acting ruthlessly in public office and acting ruthlessly in private capacity. Given that ruthlessness is an irreducible dimension of political decisions in high political office there is an inherent tension between Christian morality and political activism. This tension is the dynamic element of moral drama which typically follows a Christian’s involvement in high level politics.


Download data is not yet available.


Solomon, Robert (1995). A Passion for Justice: Emotions and the Origins of the Social Contract. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

Bloomberg News (2014). ‘Ukraine Crisis Echoes 1914, German Ex-Leader Schmidt Says’. 16 May.

BBC (2014). ‘Transcript of Intercepted Nuland-Piatt Call’. 7 February.

Nagel, Thomas (1979). „Ruthlessness in public life”, in Thomas Nagel, Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 75–90.

Hennis, Wilhelm (1963). Politik und Praktische Philosophie: Eine Studie zur Rekonstruktion der Politischen Wissenschaft, Neuwied: Springer.

Fatić, Aleksandar (2009). Freedom and Heteronomy: An Essay on the Liberal Society, Beograd: Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu.

Fatić, Aleksandar (2013). „Religiozno verovanje i modaliteti tolerancije u liberalnom društvu”. Theoria 56: 59–78.

BBC (2010). ‘Merkel Says German Multicultural Society Has Failed’. 17. Oktobar., pristup 24. oktobra 2010.

Žižek, Slavoj (2010). ‘Liberal multiculturalism masks an old barbarism with a human face’. The Guardian. 3. oktobar., pristup 28. oktobra 2010.

Mil, Džon Stjuart. (1988). O slobodi. Prevod Jelena Kovačević i Dubravka Mićunović. Beograd: Filip Višnjić. Naglasak autora ovog teksta.




How to Cite

Fatić, A. . (2014). CHRISTIAN ETHICS AND PUBLIC LIFE. KULTURA POLISA, 11(24), 109–127. Retrieved from



Original scientific work