• Lidija Eliot St. Mary College Nagoya, Japan


economy, FTA agreement, advantages, negotiations, political environment, business, strategy, government


The FTA issue has a profound strategic significance for both Japan and South Korea in this period of radical changes in the international environment. I’m speaking about reform of global supremacy, the rise of China, the decline of the United States, and other changes especially in Asia-Pacific region. FTA between Japan and South Korea is from strategic importance as can contribute not only to economy of these two countries but also to peace and stability in Asia-Pacific region and the world.


Download data is not yet available.


Aggarwal,V.K. and Koo, M.G, (2005)”Beyond Network Power? The Dynamics of Formal Economic Integration in Northeast Asia” The Pacific Review, Vol. 18 (2) pp. 189–216 Chulki. J. (2003) „The Competitive Liberalization of World Trade and Korea’s Foreign Trade policy”, Global Economic Review, Vol. 32 (2), pp. 1-19

Dent, C.M. (2008), „East Asian Regionalism, Routledge”, London

Dent, C.M. (2002), "South Korea: the FEP of a Deconstructing Developmental State". In The Foreign Economic Policies of Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Glos, pp.132-207

Cheong, I. and Cho, J. (2009) „Domestic and Foreign JKFTA Conditions and Negotiation outlook”, The Asia-Pacific Research, Vol. 16 (1), pp.159-178

Corbett, J. (2008), ‘Services Trade Liberalisation in the ASEAN Economic Community

and Beyond’, in Soesastro, H. (ed.), Deepening Economic Integration- The ASEAN

Economic Community and Beyond-, ERIA Research Project Report 2007-1-2, Chiba:

IDE-JETRO, pp.101-120.

Available at: http://www.unescap.org/tid/projects/tradeservice_s2.pdf

Fukagawa. Y. (1999) „Asian Nies in the Region’s Economic Recovery and the Options for South Korea: The Potentials for Japan-Korea FTA”, The Pacific Review, Vol. 28 (4), pp. 79-101

Fink, C and M Molinuevo (2007). „East Asia in Free Trade Agreements in Services: Roaring Tigers or Timid Pandas?”in Trade Issues in East Asia: Liberalization of Trade in Services , Washington, D.C.: East Asia and Pacific Region Poverty Reduction and Economic Management, World Bank.

Hout. T.M. and Ghemawat. P. (2010) „China Vs the World: Whose Technology is It” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 88 (12), pp 94-103

Ju, C. (2003) „The Competitive Liberalization of World Trade and Korea’s Foreign Trade Policy” Global Economic Review, Vol.32 (2), pp. 1-18

Park. S and Park. I. (2009) „Free Trade Agreements versus Customs Union: An Examination of East Asia” Asian Economic Papers”, Vol. 8(2), pp.119-139

Sekiguchi,S. 1993.”Korean Peninsula Issues and U.S.-Japan-South Korea Relations”, ed. By Gong. G, Sato, Ok.Tae. The Center for Strategic and International Studies Washington, D.C. Vol. 2, pp.71-115

Rhee, H.Y. (1998)”The Economic Crisis of South Korea and Its Political Impact”, International Journal of Korean Studies, Vol. 2(1), pp. 129-146

Urata, S.E. (2007), "Japan’s FTA Strategy and Free Trade Area of Asia-Pacific ". In Morrison, C.E. and Pedrosa, E. (eds), An APEC Trade Agenda? The Political Economy of A Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific, ISEAS, Singapore, pp. 99- 127

Wendt. A. (1992) „Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics „, International Organization, Vol.46 (2), pp. 391-425.




How to Cite

Eliot, L. . (2014). POLITICAL-ECONOMIC MOTIVES BEHIND SOUTH KOREA’S AND JAPAN’S FTA NEGOTIATIONS. KULTURA POLISA, 11(24), 81–88. Retrieved from https://kpolisa.com/index.php/kp/article/view/1161



Review Article